Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 1;6(3):189-201.
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200085. eCollection 2021 Mar.

An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems

Affiliations
Review

An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems

Thomas Kozak et al. EFORT Open Rev. .

Abstract

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was originally developed because of unsatisfactory results with anatomic shoulder arthroplasty options for the majority of degenerative shoulder conditions and fractures.After initial concerns about RTSA longevity, indications were extended to primary osteoarthritis with glenoid deficiency, massive cuff tears in younger patients, fracture, tumour and failed anatomic total shoulder replacement.Traditional RTSA by Grammont has undergone a number of iterations such as glenoid lateralization, reduced neck-shaft angle, modular, stemless components and onlay systems.The incidence of complications such as dislocation, notching and acromial fractures has also evolved.Computer navigation, 3D planning and patient-specific implantation have been in use for several years and mixed-reality guided implantation is currently being trialled.Controversies in RTSA include lateralization, stemless humeral components, subscapularis repair and treatment of acromial fractures. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:189-201. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200085.

Keywords: acromion fracture; arthroplasty; design; indications; reverse; shoulder; subscapularis repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE Conflict of interest statement: GW reports consulting fees, Support for travel to meetings for study or other purposes and royalties from Wright, related to the submitted work. The other authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Traditional Grammont-style prosthesis with medialized glenoid and 155° neck-shaft angle and inlay humeral component. Eccentric glenosphere has been used to avoid notching.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Lateralized humeral component with 135° neck-shaft angle and onlay design. Lateralized glenoid component with metal augmentation (A) or bone augmentation (B).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Stemless design reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with periprosthetic fracture.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Radiograph of scapula spine fracture post reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) (A). Three-dimensional surgical planning for plate fixation (B). Postoperative radiographs (C).

References

    1. Grammont PM, Baulot E. Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics 1993;16:65–68. - PubMed
    1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty Annual Report 2019. Adelaide: AOA, 2019.
    1. Walch G, Bacle G, Lädermann A, Nové-Josserand L, Smithers CJ. Do the indications, results, and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty change with surgeon’s experience? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012;21:1470–1477. - PubMed
    1. Wall B, Nové-Josserand L, O’Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1476–1485. - PubMed
    1. Sevivas N, Ferreira N, Andrade R, et al. . Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017;26:e265–e277. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources