Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;10(3):901-913.
doi: 10.21037/gs-20-782.

Development and validation of a nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastasis in early-stage breast cancer

Affiliations

Development and validation of a nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastasis in early-stage breast cancer

Huan Li et al. Gland Surg. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Lymph node status is an important factor in determining the prognosis of early-stage breast cancer. We endeavored to build and validate a simple nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Methods: Patients with T1-2 and non-metastasis (M0) breast cancer registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were enrolled. All patients were divided into primary cohort and validation cohort in a 2:1 ratio. In order to assess risk factors for LNM, we performed univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression, and based on results of multivariable analysis, we built the predictive nomogram model. The C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration plots were applied to assess LNM model performance. Moreover, the nomogram efficiency was further validated through the validation cohort, part of which was from the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University database.

Results: Totally, 184,531 female breast cancer with T1-2 tumor size from SEER database and 1,222 patients from the Chinese institutional data were included. There were 123,019 patients in the primary cohort and 62,734 patients in validation cohort. The LNM nomogram was composed of seven features including age at diagnosis, race, primary site, histologic type, grade, tumor size and subtype. The model showed good discrimination, with a C-index of 0.720 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.717-0.723] and good calibration. Similar C-index was 0.718 (95% CI: 0.713-0.723) in validation cohort. Consistently, ROC curves presented good discrimination in the primary cohort [area under the curve (AUC) =0.720] and the validation set (AUC =0.718) for the LNM nomogram. Calibration curve of the nomogram demonstrated good agreement.

Conclusions: With the prediction of novel validated nomogram for women with early-stage breast cancer, doctors may distinguish patients with high possibility of LNM and devise individualize treatments.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER); early-stage; lymph node metastasis (LNM); nomogram.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-782). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study selection. SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nomogram predicting the probability of positive lymph nodes. IDC, infiltrating duct carcinoma; ILC, infiltrating lobular carcinoma; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HR, hormonal receptor; HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calibration plot of the nomogram for the probability of positive lymph nodes in primary cohort (A) and validation cohort (B). (bootstrap 1,000 repetitions).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves representing the discriminatory ability of the nomogram in primary cohort (A) and validation cohort (B). AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69:7-34. 10.3322/caac.21551 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacklyn G, McGeechan K, Irwig L, et al. Trends in stage-specific breast cancer incidence in New South Wales, Australia: insights into the effects of 25 years of screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017;166:843-54. 10.1007/s10549-017-4443-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vale DB, Filho CC, Shinzato JY, et al. Downstaging in opportunistic breast cancer screening in Brazil: a temporal trend analysis. BMC Cancer 2019;19:432. 10.1186/s12885-019-5647-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi HY, Park M, Seo M, et al. Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation in Breast Cancer: Current Issues and Literature Review. Ultrasound Q 2017;33:6-14. 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000277 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7703-20. 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.001 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources