Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 25:9:653669.
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.653669. eCollection 2021.

Super-Enhancers and CTCF in Early Embryonic Cell Fate Decisions

Affiliations
Review

Super-Enhancers and CTCF in Early Embryonic Cell Fate Decisions

Puja Agrawal et al. Front Cell Dev Biol. .

Abstract

Cell fate decisions are the backbone of many developmental and disease processes. In early mammalian development, precise gene expression changes underly the rapid division of a single cell that leads to the embryo and are critically dependent on autonomous cell changes in gene expression. To understand how these lineage specifications events are mediated, scientists have had to look past protein coding genes to the cis regulatory elements (CREs), including enhancers and insulators, that modulate gene expression. One class of enhancers, termed super-enhancers, is highly active and cell-type specific, implying their critical role in modulating cell-type specific gene expression. Deletion or mutations within these CREs adversely affect gene expression and development and can cause disease. In this mini-review we discuss recent studies describing the potential roles of two CREs, enhancers and binding sites for CTCF, in early mammalian development.

Keywords: CTCF; embryonic stem cell; enhancer; nanog; pluripotency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Nanog Super-enhancers. (A) Schematic of the Nanog extended locus with the three SEs. Schematic of a theoretical loop containing all three SEs and Nanog depicting. (B) The changes in Nanog expression upon deletion (Blinka et al., 2016; Agrawal et al., 2021). (C) The interaction between the −5SE and Nanog and how it alters RNAPII dynamics (Agrawal et al., 2021). (D) The interaction between the −45SE and Nanog and its potential mechanisms. (E) The interaction between the +60SE and Nanog and the possible backup role it has in regulating the gene.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
TADs and CTCF. (A) Schematic of chromatin organization. The triangles depict a schematic of a Hi-C contact map. White arcs show the intra-TAD interactions that are insulated by CTCF. (B) Schematic of what a Hi-C contact map may look like upon CTCF depletion. White arcs show the gained interactions across previous TAD boundaries.

References

    1. Abranches E., Guedes A. M. V., Moravec M., Maamar H., Svoboda P., Raj A., et al. (2014). Stochastic NANOG fluctuations allow mouse embryonic stem cells to explore pluripotency. Development 141 2770–2779. 10.1242/dev.108910 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agrawal P., Blinka S., Pulakanti K., Reimer M. H., Stelloh C., Meyer A. E., et al. (2021). Genome editing demonstrates that the -5 kb Nanog enhancer regulates Nanog expression by modulating RNAPII initiation and/or recruitment. JBC 296:100189. 10.1074/jbc.RA120.015152 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agrawal P., Heimbruch K. E., Rao S. (2019). Genome-wide maps of transcription regulatory elements and transcription enhancers in development and disease. Compr. Physiol. 9 439–455. 10.1002/cphy.c180028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander J. M., Guan J., Li B., Maliskova L., Song M., Shen Y., et al. (2019). Live-cell imaging reveals enhancer-dependent Sox2 transcription in the absence of enhancer proximity. Elife 8:e41769. 10.7554/eLife.41769 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson E., Hill R. E. (2014). Long range regulation of the sonic hedgehog gene. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 27 54–59. 10.1016/j.gde.2014.03.011 - DOI - PubMed