Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;9(5):438.
doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5449.

Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): remaining challenges

Affiliations
Review

Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): remaining challenges

Mary Karin Connolly. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Despite progress in treating internal organ involvement in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) (SSc), such as pulmonary disease, effective treatments for the hallmark of the disease, cutaneous fibrosis, remain elusive. None of the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) have shown proven efficacy for SSc skin fibrosis, and there remain no FDA-approved medications, all of which are off-label, for cutaneous fibrosis in SSc. This review article will briefly summarize conventional therapies, biologics and hematopoietic stem cell transplants and select ongoing clinical trials in SSc. The gold standard for measuring skin fibrosis in SSc is the modified Rodnan skin score (MRSSS). This is a validated test that measures skin thickness (0 to 3) at 17 locations for a total score of 51. Improvements in skin score over time are used in clinical trials to quantitate skin fibrosis. Although recording the Rodnan skin score is technically straightforward, requiring no special equipment, and noninvasive, the fluctuating natural history of the disease includes improvement over time without interventions, rendering meaningful trials difficult to assess. Understanding of the basic molecular mechanisms driving pathologic fibrosis in SSc remains lacking, and underpins the often empiric nature and likely the lack of efficacy of many therapeutics that have been tried. Although repeated skin biopsies might be a more precise way to follow disease progression and regression, this is necessarily invasive and requires special tools. Here, this review will look at conventional therapies, biologics, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and catalog some of the ongoing clinical trials in SSc with a focus on cutaneous fibrosis.

Keywords: Systemic sclerosis; biologicals; clinical trials; therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The author has completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5449). The series “Rheumatologic Skin Disease” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. MKC served as the unpaid Guest Editor of the series. The author has no other conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Wigley FM, Boin F. Clinical features and treatment of scleroderma. In: Kelley and Firestein’s Textbook of Rheuma-tology 2017;10th ed:1424-1460.
    1. Clements PJ, Lachenbruch PA, Ng SC, et al. Skin score: a semiquantitative measure of cutaneous involvement that improves prediction of prognosis in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1256-63. 10.1002/art.1780330828 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whitfield ML, Finlay DR, Murray JI, et al. Systemic and cell type-specific gene expression patterns in scleroderma skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:12319-24. 10.1073/pnas.1635114100 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunzelmann N, Moinzadeh P, Genth E, et al. High frequency of corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapy in patients with systemic sclerosis despite limited evidence of efficacy. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:R30. 10.1186/ar2634 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Laar JM, Simms RW. Immunomodulatory, Immunoablative and Biologic therapies. In: Varga J, Denton C, Wigley F, et al., (eds) Scleroderma. Springer, Cha 2017;2nd ed:567-582.

LinkOut - more resources