Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Jul 1;41(6):352-355.
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001826.

Spinal Anesthesia is Superior to General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Achilles Tenotomy in Infants

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Spinal Anesthesia is Superior to General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Achilles Tenotomy in Infants

Michael A Acquaviva et al. J Pediatr Orthop. .

Abstract

Background: Concern about the effects of inhaled, halogenated anesthetics on neurodevelopment of infants has renewed interest in regional anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia (GA). Infants undergoing percutaneous Achilles tenotomy (PAT) are well suited for spinal anesthesia (SP).

Methods: Thirty infants (mean age: 2.3 mo) undergoing PAT with SP were compared with 15 infants (mean age: 2.0 mo) undergoing PAT with GA. Data collected included perioperative times, heart rate and blood pressure, and the administration of opioids.

Results: Ten of 15 GA (67%) patients received perioperative opioids as opposed to 1 of 30 SP patients (3.3%) (P<0.0001). The time from the start of anesthesia to the start of surgery was shorter in the SP group (8.5 vs. 14 min, P<0.0009). The time from the start of anesthesia to first oral intake was shorter in the SP group (12 vs. 31 min, P<0.0033). The time of first phase recovery (phase 1 post anesthesia care unit) was shorter in the SP group (15.5 vs. 34 min, P<0.0026). Surgery time was not significantly different between the groups (SP: 15.5 min, GA: 15 min, P=0.81).

Conclusion: Infants undergoing PAT with SP received less opioid, did not require an airway device, did not receive potent inhaled, halogenated hydrocarbon anesthetics, and exhibited faster and qualitatively better postoperative recovery.

Level of evidence: Level III-case control study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Stratmann G. Neurotoxicity of anesthetic drugs in the developing brain. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:1170–1179.
    1. Clausen NG, Kahler S, Hansen TG. Systematic review of neurocognitive outcomes used in studies of paediatric neurotoxicity. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:1255–1273.
    1. Hansen TG, Engelhardt T. Long-term neurocognitive outcomes following surgery and anaesthesia in early life. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2018;31:297–301.
    1. Davidson AJ, Morton NS, Arnup SJ, et al. Apnea after awake regional and general anesthesia in infants. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:38–54.
    1. Tirmizi H. Spinal anesthesia in infants: recent developments. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2015;28:333–338.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources