Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 29;23(4):e26940.
doi: 10.2196/26940.

Knowledge About COVID-19 Among Adults in China: Cross-sectional Online Survey

Affiliations

Knowledge About COVID-19 Among Adults in China: Cross-sectional Online Survey

Fengyun Yu et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: A detailed understanding of the public's knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19 could inform governments' public health actions in response to the pandemic.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19 among adults in China and its variation among provinces and by sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods: Between May 8 and June 8, 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey among adults in China who were registered with the private survey company KuRunData. We set a target sample size of 10,000 adults, aiming to sample 300-360 adults from each province in China. Participants were asked 25 questions that tested their knowledge about COVID-19, including measures to prevent infection, common symptoms, and recommended care-seeking behavior. We disaggregated responses by age; sex; education; province; household income; rural-urban residency; and whether or not a participant had a family member, friend, or acquaintance who they know to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2. All analyses used survey sampling weights.

Results: There were 5079 men and 4921 women who completed the questionnaire and were included in the analysis. Out of 25 knowledge questions, participants answered a mean and median of 21.4 (95% CI 21.3-21.4) and 22 (IQR 20-23) questions correctly, respectively. A total of 83.4% (95% CI 82.7%-84.1%) of participants answered four-fifths or more of the questions correctly. For at least one of four ineffective prevention measures (using a hand dryer, regular nasal irrigation, gargling mouthwash, and taking antibiotics), 68.9% (95% CI 68.0%-69.8%) of participants answered that it was an effective method to prevent a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although knowledge overall was similar across provinces, the percent of participants who answered the question on recommended care-seeking behavior correctly varied from 47.0% (95% CI 41.4%-52.7%) in Tibet to 87.5% (95% CI 84.1%-91.0%) in Beijing. Within provinces, participants who were male, were middle-aged, were residing in urban areas, and had higher household income tended to answer a higher proportion of the knowledge questions correctly.

Conclusions: This online study of individuals across China suggests that the majority of the population has good knowledge of COVID-19. However, a substantial proportion still holds misconceptions or incorrect beliefs about prevention methods and recommended health care-seeking behaviors, especially in rural areas and some less wealthy provinces in Western China. This study can inform the development of tailored public health policies and promotion campaigns by identifying knowledge areas for which misconceptions are comparatively common and provinces that have relatively low knowledge.

Keywords: COVID-19; China; cross-sectional; knowledge; perception; public health; risk; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map showing the mean overall knowledge score by province.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The proportion of the population by province with correct responses to questions about (a) prevention methods, (b) common misconceptions, (c) transmission channels, and (d) recommended actions after infection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470–473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(20)30185-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberton T, Carter ED, Chou VB, Stegmuller AR, Jackson BD, Tam Y, Sawadogo-Lewis T, Walker N. Early estimates of the indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and child mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e901–e908. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30229-1. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214-109X(20)30229-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cutler DM, Summers LH. The COVID-19 pandemic and the $16 trillion virus. JAMA. 2020 Oct 20;324(15):1495–1496. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.19759. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/33044484 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Do D, Sarker M, Chen S, Lenjani A, Tikka P, Bärnighausen T, Geldsetzer P. Healthcare worker attendance during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of fingerprint-verified data from all public-sector secondary and tertiary care facilities in Bangladesh. J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020509. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020509. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen S, Yang J, Yang W, Wang C, Bärnighausen T. COVID-19 control in China during mass population movements at New Year. Lancet. 2020 Mar 07;395(10226):764–766. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30421-9. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32105609 - DOI - PMC - PubMed