Advances in Molecular Understanding of α-Helical Membrane-Active Peptides
- PMID: 33844916
- DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00047
Advances in Molecular Understanding of α-Helical Membrane-Active Peptides
Abstract
Biological membranes separate the interior of cells or cellular compartments from their outer environments. This barrier function of membranes can be disrupted by membrane-active peptides, some of which can spontaneously penetrate through the membranes or open leaky transmembrane pores. However, the origin of their activity/toxicity is not sufficiently understood for the development of more potent peptides. To this day, there are no design rules that would be generally valid, and the role of individual amino acids tends to be sequence-specific.In this Account, we describe recent progress in understanding the design principles that govern the activity of membrane-active peptides. We focus on α-helical amphiphilic peptides and their ability to (1) translocate across phospholipid bilayers, (2) form transmembrane pores, or (3) act synergistically, i.e., to produce a significantly more potent effect in a mixture than the individual components.We refined the description of peptide translocation using computer simulations and demonstrated the effect of selected residues. Our simulations showed the necessity to explicitly include charged residues in the translocation description to correctly sample the membrane perturbations they can cause. Using this description, we calculated the translocation of helical peptides with and without the kink induced by the proline/glycine residue. The presence of the kink had no effect on the translocation barrier, but it decreased the peptide affinity to the membrane and reduced the peptide stability inside the membrane. Interestingly, the effects were mainly caused by the peptide's increased polarity, not the higher flexibility of the kink.Flexibility plays a crucial role in pore formation and affects distinct pore structures in different ways. The presence of a kink destabilizes barrel-stave pores, because the kink prevents the tight packing of peptides in the bundle, which is characteristic of the barrel-stave structure. In contrast, the kink facilitates the formation of toroidal pores, where the peptides are only loosely arranged and do not need to closely assemble. The exact position of the kink in the sequence further determines the preferred arrangement of peptides in the pore, i.e., an hourglass or U-shaped structure. In addition, we demonstrated that two self-associated (via termini) helical peptides could mimic the behavior of peptides with a helix-kink-helix motif.Finally, we review the recent findings on the peptide synergism of the archetypal mixture of Magainin 2 and PGLa peptides. We focused on a bacterial plasma membrane mimic that contains negatively charged lipids and lipids with negative intrinsic curvature. We showed that the synergistic action of peptides was highly dependent on the lipid composition. When the lipid composition and peptide/lipid ratios were changed, the systems exhibited more complex behavior than just the previously reported pore formation. We observed membrane adhesion, fusion, and even the formation of the sponge phase in this regime. Furthermore, enhanced adhesion/partitioning to the membrane was reported to be caused by lipid-induced peptide aggregation.In conclusion, the provided molecular insight into the complex behavior of membrane-active peptides provides clues for the design and modification of antimicrobial peptides or toxins.
Similar articles
-
Effect of helical kink in antimicrobial peptides on membrane pore formation.Elife. 2020 Mar 13;9:e47946. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47946. Elife. 2020. PMID: 32167466 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Helical Kink on Peptide Translocation across Phospholipid Membranes.J Phys Chem B. 2020 Jul 16;124(28):5940-5947. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c03291. Epub 2020 Jun 30. J Phys Chem B. 2020. PMID: 32603116
-
Membrane binding and pore formation of the antibacterial peptide PGLa: thermodynamic and mechanistic aspects.Biochemistry. 2000 Jan 18;39(2):442-52. doi: 10.1021/bi992146k. Biochemistry. 2000. PMID: 10631006
-
Biological activity and structural aspects of PGLa interaction with membrane mimetic systems.Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Aug;1788(8):1656-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 May 29. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009. PMID: 19481533 Review.
-
Mechanism of the binding, insertion and destabilization of phospholipid bilayer membranes by alpha-helical antimicrobial and cell non-selective membrane-lytic peptides.Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 Dec 15;1462(1-2):55-70. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(99)00200-x. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999. PMID: 10590302 Review.
Cited by
-
The limits of prediction: Why intrinsically disordered regions challenge our understanding of antimicrobial peptides.Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Feb 12;23:972-981. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.02.008. eCollection 2024 Dec. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024. PMID: 38404711 Free PMC article.
-
Study on Optimizing Novel Antimicrobial Peptides with Bifunctional Activity to Prevent and Treat Peri-Implant Disease.Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Oct 26;11(11):1482. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111482. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36358137 Free PMC article.
-
Structure-activity relationships of mitochondria-targeted tetrapeptide pharmacological compounds.Elife. 2022 Aug 1;11:e75531. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75531. Elife. 2022. PMID: 35913044 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial Peptide Mechanisms Studied by Whole-Cell Deuterium NMR.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 1;23(5):2740. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052740. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35269882 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early stages of misfolding of PAP248-286 at two different pH values: An insight from molecular dynamics simulations.Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022 Sep 3;20:4892-4901. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.08.060. eCollection 2022. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022. PMID: 36147683 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources