Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug:228:65-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.059. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

Classification Criteria for Birdshot Chorioretinitis

Collaborators

Classification Criteria for Birdshot Chorioretinitis

Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine classification criteria for birdshot chorioretinitis.

Design: Machine learning of cases with birdshot chorioretinitis and 8 other posterior uveitides.

Methods: Cases of posterior uveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on diagnosis, using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used on the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the infectious posterior uveitides / panuveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated on the validation set.

Results: One thousand sixty-eight cases of posterior uveitides, including 207 cases of birdshot chorioretinitis, were evaluated by machine learning. Key criteria for birdshot chorioretinitis included a multifocal choroiditis with (1) the characteristic appearance of a bilateral multifocal choroiditis with cream-colored or yellow-orange, oval or round choroidal spots ("birdshot" spots); (2) absent to mild anterior chamber inflammation; and (3) absent to moderate vitreous inflammation; or multifocal choroiditis with positive HLA-A29 testing and either classic "birdshot spots" or characteristic imaging on indocyanine green angiography. Overall accuracy for posterior uveitides was 93.9% in the training set and 98.0% (95% confidence interval 94.3, 99.3) in the validation set. The misclassification rates for birdshot chorioretinitis were 10% in the training set and 0% in the validation set.

Conclusions: The criteria for birdshot chorioretinitis had a low misclassification rate and seemed to perform sufficiently well for use in clinical and translational research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Douglas A. Jabs: none; Antoine P. Brezin: none; Ralph D. Levinson: none; Peter McCluskey: none; Neal Oden: none; Alan G. Palestine: none; Russell W. Read: none; Jennifer E. Thorne: Dr. Thorne engaged in a portion of this research as a consultant and was compensated for the consulting service; Brett E. Trusko: none; Albert Vitale: none; Susan E. Wittenberg: none.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Fundus photograph of a case of birdshot chorioretinitis, demonstrating multifocal yellow-orange, ovoid, choroidal spots.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Indocyanine green angiogram of a case of birdshot chorioretinitis, demonstrating multifocal, hypofluorescent choroidal spots.

References

    1. Ryan SJ, Maumenee AE. Birdshot retinochoroidopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1980; 89:31–45. - PubMed
    1. Gass JD. Vitiliginous chorioretinitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:1778–87. - PubMed
    1. Gaudio PA, Kaye DB, Crawford JB. Histopathology of birdshot retinochoroidopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;86:1439–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monnet D, Brezin AP, Holland GN, Yu F, Mahr A, Gordon LK, Levinson RD. Longitudinal cohort study of patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy. I. Baseline clinical characteristics. Am J Ophthalomol 2006;141:135–42. - PubMed
    1. Monnet D, Levinson RD, Holland GN, Haddad L, Yu F, Brezin AP. Longitudinal cohort study of patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy. III. Macular imaging at baseline. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:818–28. - PubMed

Publication types