Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;2(7):e311-e319.
doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study

Affiliations

Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study

Victor M Corman et al. Lancet Microbe. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Antigen point-of-care tests (AgPOCTs) can accelerate SARS-CoV-2 testing. As some AgPOCTs have become available, interest is growing in their utility and performance. Here we aimed to compare the analytical sensitivity and specificity of seven commercially available AgPOCT devices.

Methods: In a single-centre, laboratory evaluation study, we compared AgPOCT products from seven suppliers: the Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, the RapiGEN BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag, the Healgen Coronavirus Ag Rapid Test Cassette (Swab), the Coris BioConcept COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip, the R-Biopharm RIDA QUICK SARS-CoV-2 Antigen, the nal von minden NADAL COVID-19 Ag Test, and the Roche-SD Biosensor SARS-CoV Rapid Antigen Test. Tests were evaluated on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein, cultured endemic and emerging coronaviruses, stored respiratory samples with known SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, stored samples from patients with respiratory pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2, and self-sampled swabs from healthy volunteers. We estimated analytical sensitivity in terms of approximate viral concentrations (quantified by real-time RT-PCR) that yielded positive AgPOCT results, and specificity in terms of propensity to generate false-positive results.

Findings: In 138 clinical samples with quantified SARS-CoV-2 viral load, the 95% limit of detection (concentration at which 95% of test results were positive) in six of seven AgPOCT products ranged between 2·07 × 106 and 2·86 × 107 copies per swab, with an outlier (RapiGEN) at 1·57 × 1010 copies per swab. The assays showed no cross-reactivity towards cell culture or tissue culture supernatants containing any of the four endemic human coronaviruses (HCoV‑229E, HCoV‑NL63, HCoV‑OC43, or HCoV‑HKU1) or MERS-CoV, with the exception of the Healgen assay in one repeat test on HCoV-HKU1 supernatant. SARS-CoV was cross-detected by all assays. Cumulative specificities among stored clinical samples with non-SARS-CoV-2 infections (n=100) and self-samples from healthy volunteers (n=35; cumulative sample n=135) ranged between 98·5% (95% CI 94·2-99·7) and 100·0% (97·2-100·0) in five products, with two outliers at 94·8% (89·2-97·7; R-Biopharm) and 88·9% (82·1-93·4; Healgen). False-positive results did not appear to be associated with any specific respiratory pathogen.

Interpretation: The sensitivity range of most AgPOCTs overlaps with SARS-CoV-2 viral loads typically observed in the first week of symptoms, which marks the infectious period in most patients. The AgPOCTs with limit of detections that approximate virus concentrations at which patients are infectious might enable shortcuts in decision making in various areas of health care and public health.

Funding: EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, German Ministry of Research, German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, German Ministry of Health, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA concentrations in clinical samples (n=138) (A) Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA concentrations after AgPOCT testing. Horizontal lines represent the median and IQR. (B) Overview of tested samples and corresponding outcomes in the seven AgPOCTs. AgPOCT=antigen point-of-care test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted AgPOCT results as a function of log10 SARS-CoV-2 RNA per mL Datapoints show log10 SARS-CoV-2 RNA per mL (with jitter added on the y-axis) against positive (1·0) and negative (0·0) AgPOCT results. The dashed line and accompanying shaded region represent the mean and 95% HPDI of the Bayesian binomial logistic regression curve fitted to the data. The vertical lines (shaded areas) correspond to the mean (95% HPDI) SARS-CoV-2 concentrations (log10 RNA copies per mL) at which 50% (orange) and 95% (black) of samples have a positive AgPOCT result (1·0; table 1). Model fit for the RapiGEN and Healgen tests was poor, due to a large difference in the number of positive and negative test results. AgPOCT=antigen point-of-care test. HPDI=highest posterior density interval.

Comment in

References

    1. WHO Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2. Interim guidance. Sept 11, 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/diagnostic-testing-for-sars-cov-2
    1. Kretzschmar ME, Rozhnova G, Bootsma MCJ, van Boven M, van de Wijgert JHHM, Bonten MJM. Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5:e452–e459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guglielmi G. The explosion of new coronavirus tests that could help to end the pandemic. Nature. 2020;583:506–509. - PubMed
    1. Mak GC, Cheng PK, Lau SS. Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. J Clin Virol. 2020;129 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruning AHL, Leeflang MMG, Vos JMBW. Rapid tests for influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, and other respiratory viruses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:1026–1032. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances