Validating the Mandarin version of the Memorial delirium assessment scale in general medical hospital patients
- PMID: 33847072
- DOI: 10.1111/appy.12468
Validating the Mandarin version of the Memorial delirium assessment scale in general medical hospital patients
Abstract
Introduction: Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric condition in the general hospital population. Thus, the goal of the present study is to extend the use of diagnostic tools for delirium by developing and validating a Mandarin version of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS).
Methods: Participants were sampled from two general Mackay Memorial Hospital locations in Taipei and Danshui. Board-certified psychiatrists assessed patients using the MDAS, confusion assessment method (CAM), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Another consultation-liaison psychiatrist confirmed the diagnosis of delirium. We assessed the reliability and validity of the MDAS, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off point for identifying delirium.
Results: Of the 61 patients assessed, 29 were diagnosed with delirium. The mean MDAS score was 16.7 for delirium patients and 4.1 for nondelirium patients. The MDAS has good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.912. Interrater reliability was 0.996 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.992-0.998). The diagnostic cut-off value for the Mandarin version of the MDAS was 9, with a high sensitivity (93.1%) and specificity (96.9%). Factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure; these factors accounted for 58.37% and 14.42% of the variance. A high correlation was found between the MDAS and the CAM scores (r = -0.849, p < .001) as well as the MMSE (r = -0.875, p < .001).
Discussion: The Mandarin MDAS exhibited good reliability and validity for assessing general hospital patients.
Keywords: confusion assessment method; delirium; memorial delirium assessment scale; mini-mental state examination; receiver operating characteristic curve.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale-Thai Version (MDAS-T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients.Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e335-e340. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0399. Epub 2019 Nov 7. Oncologist. 2020. PMID: 32043769 Free PMC article.
-
Using the Chinese version of Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale to describe postoperative delirium after hip surgery.Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Nov 5;6:297. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00297. eCollection 2014. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 25414664 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing delirium in cancer patients: the Italian versions of the Delirium Rating Scale and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Jan;21(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00241-4. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001. PMID: 11223315
-
Does this patient have delirium?: value of bedside instruments.JAMA. 2010 Aug 18;304(7):779-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1182. JAMA. 2010. PMID: 20716741 Review.
-
The measurement of delirium: review of scales.Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003 Fall;17(3):207-24. doi: 10.1891/rtnp.17.3.207.53186. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003. PMID: 14655974 Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Armstrong, S. C., Cozza, K. L., & Watanabe, K. S. (1997). The misdiagnosis of delirium. Psychosomatics, 38, 433-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(97)71420-8
-
- Bergeron, N., Dubois, M. J., Dumont, M., Dial, S., & Skrobik, Y. (2001). Intensive care delirium screening checklist: Evaluation of a new screening tool. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 27, 859-864.
-
- Breitbart, W., Rosenfeld, B., Roth, A., Smith, M. J., Cohen, K., & Passik, S. (1997). The memorial delirium assessment scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 13, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(96)00316-8
-
- DeCrane, S. K., Sands, K., Ashland, M., Lim, E., Tsai, T. L., Paul, S., & Leung, J. M. (2011). Factors associated with recovery from early postoperative delirium. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing, 26, 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2011.03.001
-
- Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical