Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;14(1):e12468.
doi: 10.1111/appy.12468. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

Validating the Mandarin version of the Memorial delirium assessment scale in general medical hospital patients

Affiliations

Validating the Mandarin version of the Memorial delirium assessment scale in general medical hospital patients

Ching-Ho Hu et al. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric condition in the general hospital population. Thus, the goal of the present study is to extend the use of diagnostic tools for delirium by developing and validating a Mandarin version of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS).

Methods: Participants were sampled from two general Mackay Memorial Hospital locations in Taipei and Danshui. Board-certified psychiatrists assessed patients using the MDAS, confusion assessment method (CAM), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Another consultation-liaison psychiatrist confirmed the diagnosis of delirium. We assessed the reliability and validity of the MDAS, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off point for identifying delirium.

Results: Of the 61 patients assessed, 29 were diagnosed with delirium. The mean MDAS score was 16.7 for delirium patients and 4.1 for nondelirium patients. The MDAS has good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.912. Interrater reliability was 0.996 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.992-0.998). The diagnostic cut-off value for the Mandarin version of the MDAS was 9, with a high sensitivity (93.1%) and specificity (96.9%). Factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure; these factors accounted for 58.37% and 14.42% of the variance. A high correlation was found between the MDAS and the CAM scores (r = -0.849, p < .001) as well as the MMSE (r = -0.875, p < .001).

Discussion: The Mandarin MDAS exhibited good reliability and validity for assessing general hospital patients.

Keywords: confusion assessment method; delirium; memorial delirium assessment scale; mini-mental state examination; receiver operating characteristic curve.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. Armstrong, S. C., Cozza, K. L., & Watanabe, K. S. (1997). The misdiagnosis of delirium. Psychosomatics, 38, 433-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(97)71420-8
    1. Bergeron, N., Dubois, M. J., Dumont, M., Dial, S., & Skrobik, Y. (2001). Intensive care delirium screening checklist: Evaluation of a new screening tool. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 27, 859-864.
    1. Breitbart, W., Rosenfeld, B., Roth, A., Smith, M. J., Cohen, K., & Passik, S. (1997). The memorial delirium assessment scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 13, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(96)00316-8
    1. DeCrane, S. K., Sands, K., Ashland, M., Lim, E., Tsai, T. L., Paul, S., & Leung, J. M. (2011). Factors associated with recovery from early postoperative delirium. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing, 26, 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2011.03.001
    1. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6

LinkOut - more resources