Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 13;23(4):e27275.
doi: 10.2196/27275.

Impact of Big Data Analytics on People's Health: Overview of Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for Future Studies

Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento  1   2 , Milena Soriano Marcolino  3   4 , Hebatullah Mohamed Abdulazeem  5 , Ishanka Weerasekara  6   7 , Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat  8 , Marcos André Gonçalves  9 , David Novillo-Ortiz  8
Affiliations

Impact of Big Data Analytics on People's Health: Overview of Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for Future Studies

Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Although the potential of big data analytics for health care is well recognized, evidence is lacking on its effects on public health.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the use of big data analytics on people's health based on the health indicators and core priorities in the World Health Organization (WHO) General Programme of Work 2019/2023 and the European Programme of Work (EPW), approved and adopted by its Member States, in addition to SARS-CoV-2-related studies. Furthermore, we sought to identify the most relevant challenges and opportunities of these tools with respect to people's health.

Methods: Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Epistemonikos) were searched from the inception date to September 21, 2020. Systematic reviews assessing the effects of big data analytics on health indicators were included. Two authors independently performed screening, selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2) checklist.

Results: The literature search initially yielded 185 records, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria, involving more than 5,000,000 patients. Most of the included studies used patient data collected from electronic health records, hospital information systems, private patient databases, and imaging datasets, and involved the use of big data analytics for noncommunicable diseases. "Probability of dying from any of cardiovascular, cancer, diabetes or chronic renal disease" and "suicide mortality rate" were the most commonly assessed health indicators and core priorities within the WHO General Programme of Work 2019/2023 and the EPW 2020/2025. Big data analytics have shown moderate to high accuracy for the diagnosis and prediction of complications of diabetes mellitus as well as for the diagnosis and classification of mental disorders; prediction of suicide attempts and behaviors; and the diagnosis, treatment, and prediction of important clinical outcomes of several chronic diseases. Confidence in the results was rated as "critically low" for 25 reviews, as "low" for 7 reviews, and as "moderate" for 3 reviews. The most frequently identified challenges were establishment of a well-designed and structured data source, and a secure, transparent, and standardized database for patient data.

Conclusions: Although the overall quality of included studies was limited, big data analytics has shown moderate to high accuracy for the diagnosis of certain diseases, improvement in managing chronic diseases, and support for prompt and real-time analyses of large sets of varied input data to diagnose and predict disease outcomes.

Trial registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42020214048; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=214048.

Keywords: World Health Organization; big data; big data analytics; evidence-based medicine; health status; machine learning; overview; public health; secondary data analysis; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the different phases of article retrieval.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ristevski B, Chen M. Big data analytics in medicine and healthcare. J Integr Bioinform. 2018 May 10;15(3):20170030. doi: 10.1515/jib-2017-0030. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29746254 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Panahiazar M, Taslimitehrani V, Jadhav A, Pathak J. Empowering personalized medicine with big data and semantic web technology: promises, challenges, and use cases. Proc IEEE Int Conf Big Data. 2014 Oct;2014:790–795. doi: 10.1109/BigData.2014.7004307. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25705726 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. 13th General Programme of Work (GPW13) WHO Impact Framework. World Health Organization. 2019. [2020-12-05]. https://www.who.int/about/what-we-do/GPW13_WHO_Impact_Framework_Indicato....
    1. The European Programme of Work, 2020–2025 – “United Action for Better Health”. World Health Organization, regional office for Europe. 2020. [2020-12-15]. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-policy/european-program....
    1. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Chou R, Shekelle P, Robinson KA. Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):776–782. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00010. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms