Swallowing therapy compared to standard care may not have had a beneficial effect on the incidence of pneumonia for patients in acute care. Author's reply
- PMID: 33847770
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06381-7
Swallowing therapy compared to standard care may not have had a beneficial effect on the incidence of pneumonia for patients in acute care. Author's reply
Comment on
-
Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jul;46(7):1326-1338. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06126-y. Epub 2020 Jun 8. Intensive Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32514597 Free PMC article.
-
Swallowing therapy compared to standard care may not have had a beneficial effect on the incidence of pneumonia for patients in acute care.Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun;47(6):716-717. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06337-3. Epub 2021 Feb 8. Intensive Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33555360 No abstract available.
References
-
- Zheng F, Chen X, Zhou J, Hu W, Krischek B (2021) Swallowing therapy compared to standard care may not have had a beneficial effect on the incidence of pneumonia for patients in acute care. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06337-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Duncan S, McAuley DF, Walshe M, McGaughey J, Anand R, Fallis R, Blackwood B (2020) Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 46:1326–1338 - DOI
-
- Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration
-
- Duncan S, Gaughey JM, Fallis R et al (2019) Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 8:283. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1196-0 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources