Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;30(3):811-816.
doi: 10.1111/inm.12866. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

Open Dialogue, need-adapted mental health care, and implementation fidelity: A discussion paper

Edward Waters  1   2 , Benjamin Ong  3   4 , Kristof Mikes-Liu  5   6 , Andrea McCloughen  3 , Alan Rosen  7   8 , Steven Mayers  1 , Anna Sidis  9 , Lisa Dawson  1 , Niels Buus  1   3   10
Affiliations

Open Dialogue, need-adapted mental health care, and implementation fidelity: A discussion paper

Edward Waters et al. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Open Dialogue is a need-adapted approach to mental health care that was originally developed in Finland. Like other need-adapted approaches, Open Dialogue aims to meet consumer's needs and promote collaborative person-centred dialogue to support recovery. Need-adapted mental health care is distinguished by flexibility and responsiveness. Fidelity, defined from an implementation science perspective as the delivery of distinctive interventions in a high quality and effective fashion is a key consideration in health care. However, flexibility presents challenges for evaluating fidelity, which is much easier to evaluate when manualization and reproducible processes are possible. Hence, it remains unclear whether Open Dialogue and other need-adapted mental health interventions can be meaningfully evaluated for fidelity. The aim of this paper was to critically appraise and advance the evaluation of fidelity in need-adapted mental health care, using Open Dialogue as a case study. The paper opens a discussion about how fidelity should be evaluated in flexible, complex interventions, and identifies key questions that need to be asked by practitioners working in need-adapted mental health care to ensure they deliver these interventions as intended and in an evidence-based fashion.

Keywords: evidence-based nursing; implementation science; mental health; nursing; philosophy; psychiatric nursing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alvarez Monjaras, M. (2019). Fidelity Measurement for the Implementation of Social Networks Interventions in Complex Mental Health. London: University College London DClinPsych thesis https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10083112/.
    1. Barker, P. & Buchanan-Barker, P. (2005). The Tidal Model. A Guide for Mental Health Professionals. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
    1. Bellingham, B., Buus, N., McCloughen, A. et al. (2018). Peer work in Open Dialogue: A discussion paper. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27, 1574-1583.
    1. Blanche, E.I., Fogelberg, D., Diaz, J., Carlson, M. & Clark, F. (2011). Manualization of occupational therapy interventions: illustrations from the pressure ulcer prevention research program. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65 (6), 711-719.
    1. Buus, N., Bikic, A., Jacobsen, E.K., Muller-Nielsen, K., Aagaard, J. & Rossen, C.B. (2017). Adapting and implementing open dialogue in the Scandinavian countries: a scoping review. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 38, 391-401.

LinkOut - more resources