Copanlisib plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (CHRONOS-3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
- PMID: 33848462
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00145-5
Copanlisib plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (CHRONOS-3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Oncol 2021; 22: 678-89.Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jun;22(6):e239. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00287-4. Lancet Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34087150 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Copanlisib, an intravenous pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, showed efficacy and safety as monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma who had received at least two therapies. The CHRONOS-3 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of copanlisib plus rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Methods: CHRONOS-3 was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in 186 academic medical centres across Asia, Australia, Europe, New Zealand, North America, Russia, South Africa, and South America. Patients aged 18 years and older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of no more than 2 and histologically confirmed CD20-positive indolent B-cell lymphoma relapsed after the last anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody-containing therapy and progression-free and treatment-free for at least 12 months, or at least 6 months for patients unwilling or unfit to receive chemotherapy, were randomly assigned (2:1) with an interactive voice-web response system via block randomisation (block size of six) to copanlisib (60 mg given as a 1-h intravenous infusion on an intermittent schedule on days 1, 8, and 15 [28-day cycle]) plus rituximab (375 mg/m2 given intravenously weekly on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 during cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 3, 5, 7, and 9) or placebo plus rituximab, stratified on the basis of histology, progression-free and treatment-free interval, presence of bulky disease, and previous treatment with PI3K inhibitors. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in the full analysis set (all randomised patients) by masked central review. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02367040 and is ongoing.
Findings: Between Aug 3, 2015, and Dec 17, 2019, 652 patients were screened for eligibility. 307 of 458 patients were randomly assigned to copanlisib plus rituximab and 151 patients were randomly assigned to placebo plus rituximab. With a median follow-up of 19·2 months (IQR 7·4-28·8) and 205 total events, copanlisib plus rituximab showed a statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival versus placebo plus rituximab; median progression-free survival 21·5 months (95% CI 17·8-33·0) versus 13·8 months (10·2-17·5; hazard ratio 0·52 [95% CI 0·39-0·69]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hyperglycaemia (173 [56%] of 307 patients in the copanlisib plus rituximab group vs 12 [8%] of 146 in the placebo plus rituximab group) and hypertension (122 [40%] vs 13 [9%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 145 (47%) of 307 patients receiving copanlisib plus rituximab and 27 (18%) of 146 patients receiving placebo plus rituximab. One (<1%) drug-related death (pneumonitis) occurred in the copanlisib plus rituximab group and none occurred in the placebo plus rituximab group.
Interpretation: Copanlisib plus rituximab improved progression-free survival in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma compared with placebo plus rituximab. To our knowledge, copanlisib is the first PI3K inhibitor to be safely combined with rituximab and the first to show broad and superior efficacy in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Funding: Bayer.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests MJM reports consultancy with Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, ImmunoVaccine Technologies, Juno Therapeutics, Merck, Rocket Medical, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Teva, and TG Therapeutics; honoraria from Bayer, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, ImmunoVaccine Technologies, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, and TG Therapeutics; and research funding from Bayer, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, IGM Biosciences, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Rocket Medical, and Seattle Genetics. MÖ reports research funding from AbbVie, Archigen Biotech, Bayer, Celgene, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, MSD, and Takeda; travel support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, and Takeda; honoraria from Amgen and Takeda; and other financial relationships with Abdi İbrahim, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi. WJ reports research funding from Bayer, Gilead, MEI Pharma, and TG Therapeutics. RB reports clinical trial support from AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Alexion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen-Cilag, MorphoSys, Pfizer, Portola, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Technoclone; institutional research support from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Portola, Takeda, and Technoclone; and clinical advisory board participation with Janssen-Cilag and Roche. KG reports honoraria for advisory boards from Amgen, Celgene, Novartis, Ratiopharm, and Roche. TU reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Mundipharma, Nippon Shinyaku, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Otsuka, Pfizer, and Takeda. LMS, AC, AM, and BHC are employees of Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. FH is an employee of Bayer. PLZ reports honoraria from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Merck, MSD, Roche, Servier, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, and Verastem; board of directors or advisory committee memberships with AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, EUSA Pharma, Gilead, Immune Design, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, Kyowa Kirin, Merck, MSD, Portola, Roche, Sandoz, Servier, Takeda, and Verastem; speakers' bureau involvement with AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, EUSA Pharma, Gilead, Immune Design, Incyte, Janssen, Janssen-Cilag, Kyowa Kirin, Merck, MSD, Portola, Roche, Servier, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, and Verastem; consultancy for EUSA Pharma, Janssen, MSD, Sanofi, and Verastem; and research funding from Portola. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Copanlisib safe and active in combination.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun;18(6):322. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00512-1. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33879868 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Obinutuzumab plus bendamustine versus bendamustine monotherapy in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (GADOLIN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1081-1093. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30097-3. Epub 2016 Jun 23. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27345636 Clinical Trial.
-
CHRONOS-4: phase 3 study of copanlisib plus rituximab-based immunochemotherapy in relapsed indolent B-cell lymphoma.Blood Adv. 2024 Sep 24;8(18):4866-4876. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013236. Blood Adv. 2024. PMID: 39058951 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Rituximab: a review of its use in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.Drugs. 2003;63(8):803-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363080-00005. Drugs. 2003. PMID: 12662126 Review.
-
Ibrutinib combined with bendamustine and rituximab compared with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (HELIOS): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00465-9. Epub 2015 Dec 5. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26655421 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of copanlisib in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 11;13:1034253. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1034253. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36439091 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Clinical review considerations of class I PI3K inhibitors in hematolymphatic malignancies by Center for Drug Evaluation.Chin J Cancer Res. 2022 Aug 30;34(4):415-421. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.04.09. Chin J Cancer Res. 2022. PMID: 36199534 Free PMC article.
-
Novel targeted drugs for follicular and marginal zone lymphoma: a comprehensive review.Front Oncol. 2023 May 3;13:1170394. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1170394. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37207160 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Harnessing the Molecular Fingerprints of B Cell Lymphoma for Precision Therapy.J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 1;11(19):5834. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195834. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36233702 Free PMC article.
-
PI3K inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: where do we go from here?Haematologica. 2023 Jan 1;108(1):9-21. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.281266. Haematologica. 2023. PMID: 35899388 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Meta-analysis of the Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Cancer Treated with Inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway.Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2025 Feb;25(2):269-281. doi: 10.1007/s12012-024-09933-7. Epub 2024 Nov 9. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2025. PMID: 39521735
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials