Review of infective dose, routes of transmission and outcome of COVID-19 caused by the SARS-COV-2: comparison with other respiratory viruses
- PMID: 33849679
- PMCID: PMC8082124
- DOI: 10.1017/S0950268821000790
Review of infective dose, routes of transmission and outcome of COVID-19 caused by the SARS-COV-2: comparison with other respiratory viruses
Erratum in
-
Review of infective dose, routes of transmission and outcome of COVID-19 caused by the SARS-COV-2: comparison with other respiratory viruses- CORRIGENDUM.Epidemiol Infect. 2021 May 14;149:e116. doi: 10.1017/S0950268821001084. Epidemiol Infect. 2021. PMID: 33985614 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is pandemic. Prevention and control strategies require an improved understanding of SARS-CoV-2 dynamics. We did a rapid review of the literature on SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics with a focus on infective dose. We sought comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 with other respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV-1 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. We examined laboratory animal and human studies. The literature on infective dose, transmission and routes of exposure was limited specially in humans, and varying endpoints were used for measurement of infection. Despite variability in animal studies, there was some evidence that increased dose at exposure correlated with higher viral load clinically, and severe symptoms. Higher viral load measures did not reflect coronavirus disease 2019 severity. Aerosol transmission seemed to raise the risk of more severe respiratory complications in animals. An accurate quantitative estimate of the infective dose of SARS-CoV-2 in humans is not currently feasible and needs further research. Our review suggests that it is small, perhaps about 100 particles. Further work is also required on the relationship between routes of transmission, infective dose, co-infection and outcomes.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; infective dose; respiratory viruses; viral dynamics; viral load.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Krämer A, Akmatov M and Kretzschmar M (2009) Principles of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, in Modern Infectious Disease Epidemiology. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 85–99.
-
- Teunis PF, Nagelkerke NJ and Haas CN (1999) Dose response models for infectious gastroenteritis. Risk Analysis 19, 1251–1260. - PubMed
-
- Ward RL, Akin EW and D'Alessio DJ (1984) Minimum infective dose of animal viruses. Critical Reviews in Environmental Control 14, 297–310.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
