Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Apr;9(4):e002501.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002501.

Prognostic impact of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prognostic impact of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Giovanni Fucà et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the new standard of care in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Since tumor response dynamic parameters already shown a strong association with survival outcomes in patients with mCRC treated with first-line therapy, we investigated the association of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DoR) in patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC treated with ICIs.

Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study in patients with dMMR and/or MSI-high mCRC treated with ICIs (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with or without anti-CTLA-4 agents) with measurable disease and at least one post-baseline radiological disease reassessment. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. A maximally selected statistics method in a Cox regression model for progression-free survival (PFS) was used to determine the optimal cut-offs for ETS and DoR.

Results: We included a total of 169 patients: 116 (68.6%) were treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, whereas 53 (31.4%) with anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 agents. Patients with primary progressive disease (N=37, 21.9%), experienced an extremely poor overall survival (OS) and were evaluated separately. In patients with clinical benefit, we observed a significant association between ETS and DoR with both OS and PFS, and we identified a relative reduction of at least 1% as the optimal cut-off for ETS and a relative reduction of at least 50% as the optimal cut-off for DoR.

Conclusions: ETS and DoR are important prognostic factors in patients with MSI-high mCRC treated with ICIs that might be useful to design treatment intensification/deintensification strategies. A prospective validation of both is warranted.

Keywords: gastrointestinal neoplasms; immunotherapy; tumor biomarkers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: GC reports the following competing interests outside the present work: advisory board member of Novartis, Roche, Lilly, Daichi-Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Veracyte and Genomic Health; scientific advisor for Ellipsis. All the remaining authors declared no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS (panel A) and PFS (panel B) according to ETS. ETS, early tumor shrinkage; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS (A, C) and PFS (B, D) according to ETS and the type of ICI regimen. ETS, early tumor shrinkage; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS (A) and PFS (B) according to DoR. DoR, depth of response; OS, overall survival; minPR, minor partial response; PFS, progression-free survival; VGPR, very good partial response.

Comment in

  • Letter to the Editor from Colle et al.
    Colle R, Andre T, Menu Y. Colle R, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Jun;9(6):e002997. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002997. J Immunother Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34162716 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Overman MJ, Lonardi S, Wong KYM, et al. . Durable clinical benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in DNA mismatch Repair-Deficient/Microsatellite Instability-High metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:773–9. 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.9901 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Overman MJ, McDermott R, Leach JL, et al. . Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:1182–91. 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30422-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. André T, Shiu K-K, Kim TW, et al. . Pembrolizumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2207–18. 10.1056/NEJMoa2017699 - DOI - PubMed
    1. NCCN . Clinical practice Guidelies in oncology, version 2, 2021. Available: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf
    1. Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, et al. . Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: results from phase III tribe trial by the Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest. Ann Oncol 2015;26:1188–94. 10.1093/annonc/mdv112 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances