Comparing activated brain regions between noisy and conventional galvanic vestibular stimulation using functional magnetic resonance imaging
- PMID: 33850089
- DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001629
Comparing activated brain regions between noisy and conventional galvanic vestibular stimulation using functional magnetic resonance imaging
Abstract
Objective: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) enhances vestibular sensory inputs in vestibular afferents. However, it is unclear whether noisy and conventional GVS activate different regions of the brain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in activated brain regions between those two interventions using functional MRI (fMRI).
Methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to the noisy GVS or conventional GVS groups. Brain activity was measured during stimulation and compared with that during resting fMRI. This study used a blocked design comprising four task-rest blocks, each consisting of a 30-s period of vestibular stimulation followed by a 30-s period of rest. We evaluated the differences in contrast images between the noisy and conventional GVS groups.
Results: The noisy GVS group showed significantly increased activation in the vestibular system-related brain regions, including the insula and central operculum. The conventional GVS group showed significant activity in multisensory areas, including the supramarginal gyrus, central operculum and opercular part of the inferior frontal gyrus. Thus, the noisy GVS group showed significantly increased activity in the insula, putamen and central operculum compared with the conventional GVS group.
Conclusions: Noisy GVS could increase brain activity in the insular peripheral region compared to conventional GVS. Our results extend the literature about the importance of the stochastic resonance of noise addition for the vestibular system.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Increased brain responsivity to galvanic vestibular stimulation in bilateral vestibular failure.Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:101942. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101942. Epub 2019 Jul 19. Neuroimage Clin. 2019. PMID: 31382239 Free PMC article.
-
Greater functional activation during galvanic vestibular stimulation is associated with improved postural stability: a GVS-fMRI study.Somatosens Mot Res. 2020 Dec;37(4):257-261. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2020.1803256. Epub 2020 Aug 5. Somatosens Mot Res. 2020. PMID: 32752911
-
Neural interference effects on lateral vestibulospinal tract excitability by noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation.Clin Neurophysiol. 2024 Dec;168:153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.11.002. Epub 2024 Nov 15. Clin Neurophysiol. 2024. PMID: 39571329 Clinical Trial.
-
A review of parameter settings for galvanic vestibular stimulation in clinical applications.Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Feb 3;19:1518727. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1518727. eCollection 2025. Front Hum Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 39981130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Galvanic vestibular stimulation: from basic concepts to clinical applications.J Neurophysiol. 2019 Jun 1;121(6):2237-2255. doi: 10.1152/jn.00035.2019. Epub 2019 Apr 17. J Neurophysiol. 2019. PMID: 30995162 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimizing noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) for postural control: methodological considerations when individualizing the signal for people with bilateral vestibulopathy.Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 20;16:1609123. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1609123. eCollection 2025. Front Neurol. 2025. PMID: 40621095 Free PMC article.
-
Executive functions in patients with bilateral and unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction.J Neurol. 2024 Jun;271(6):3291-3308. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12267-7. Epub 2024 Mar 11. J Neurol. 2024. PMID: 38466421 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on the Muscle Activity and Joint Movements in Different Standing Postures Conditions.Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 2;16:891669. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.891669. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35721349 Free PMC article.
-
Properties of standing balance control under noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation.Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 15;16:1500308. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1500308. eCollection 2025. Front Neurol. 2025. PMID: 40303888 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in vestibular-related responses to combined noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.Exp Brain Res. 2024 Jan;242(1):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06731-5. Epub 2023 Nov 15. Exp Brain Res. 2024. PMID: 37966504
References
-
- Goldberg JM, Smith CE, Fernández C. Relation between discharge regularity and responses to externally applied galvanic currents in vestibular nerve afferents of the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1984; 51:1236–1256.
-
- Minor LB, Goldberg JM. Vestibular-nerve inputs to the vestibulo-ocular reflex: a functional-ablation study in the squirrel monkey. J Neurosci. 1991; 11:1636–1648.
-
- Bonan IV, Leblong E, Leplaideur S, Laviolle B, Tassel Ponche S, Yelnik AP. The effect of optokinetic and galvanic vestibular stimulations in reducing post-stroke postural asymmetry. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016; 127:842–847.
-
- Lopez C, Blanke O, Mast FW. The human vestibular cortex revealed by coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Neuroscience. 2012; 212:159–179.
-
- zu Eulenburg P, Caspers S, Roski C, Eickhoff SB. Meta-analytical definition and functional connectivity of the human vestibular cortex. Neuroimage. 2012; 60:162–169.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous