Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;10(3):1506-1520.
doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1150.

Towards a new WHO classification of renal cell tumor: what the clinician needs to know-a narrative review

Alessia Cimadamore  1 , Liang Cheng  2 , Marina Scarpelli  1 , Francesco Massari  3 , Veronica Mollica  3 , Matteo Santoni  4 , Antonio Lopez-Beltran  5 , Rodolfo Montironi  1 , Holger Moch  6
Affiliations
Review

Towards a new WHO classification of renal cell tumor: what the clinician needs to know-a narrative review

Alessia Cimadamore et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

In 1952, renal cell carcinomas had been divided into 2 categories-clear cell or granular cell-depending upon their cytoplasmic staining characteristics. In the following years, the inventory of renal epithelial tumors has expanded by the addition of tumors named by their architectural pattern (i.e., papillary RCC, tubulocystic RCC), anatomic location (i.e., collecting duct carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma), associated diseases (i.e., acquired cystic disease-associated RCCs). With the extensive application of molecular diagnostic techniques, it becomes possible to detect genetic distinctions between various types of renal neoplasm and discover new entities, otherwise misdiagnosed or diagnosed as unclassified RCC. Some tumors such as ALK rearrangement-associated RCC, MiT family translocation renal carcinomas, SDH-deficient renal cancer or FH-deficient RCC, are defined by their molecular characteristics. The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal neoplasms account for more than 50 entities and provisional entities. New entities might be included in the upcoming WHO classification. The aim of this review is to summarise and discuss the newly acquired data and evidence on the clinical, pathological, molecular features and on the prognosis of new RCC entities, which will hopefully increase the awareness and the acceptance of these entities among clinicians and improve prognostication for individual patients.

Keywords: Renal cell carcinoma; Von Hippel-Lindau gene (VHL); anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK); classification; clear cell RCC; emerging entities; fumarate hydratase (FH); molecular pathology; non-clear cells RCC; succinate dehydrogenase (SDH).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1150). The series “Update on Molecular Classification and Individualized Treatments of Genitourinary Tumors” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. AC, LC, MS, ALB and RM served as the unpaid Guest Editors of the series. LC serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Translational Andrology and Urology from Dec 2018 to Nov 2022. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
FH-Deficient RCC, at low (2×) (A) and high magnification (20×) (B), with strong and diffuse positivity for 2SC and loss of FH expression (inserts); Succinate Dehydrogenase Deficient Neoplasia (10×) (C) with loss of SDH2 expression (insert); Tubulo-cystic RCC (10×)(D), at low magnification (insert).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clear cell papillary RCC. Clear cells of low nuclear grade, variable papillary, tubular-acinar and cystic architecture in a fibroleiomyomatous stroma (10×) (A), “cup-shaped” carbonic anhydrase IX staining distribution (20×) (B), strong and diffuse CK7 positivity (20×) (C). Acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma (4×) (D), note the oxalate crystals (arrow) at higher magnification (insert); Thyroid like follicular RCC (4×) (E).
Figure 3
Figure 3
ALK Rearrangement-associated RCC (A, 10×) with mucinous background, ALK-IHC membrane expression (B, 10×); HOT (C, 10×) and LOT (D, 10×), with scant and diffuse CK7 expression, respectively (inserts, 20×).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Xp11 translocation RCCs (A, 10×), TFE3 IHC staining (insert); Mucinous tubular spindle cells carcinoma (B, 4×); Renal medullary carcinoma (C, 10×) with loss of SMARCB1 (INI1) expression by IHC (insert); Collecting duct carcinoma (D, 4×).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC at low magnification (A, 2×) and high magnification (B, 20×), CK20 expression (insert); Biphasic squamoid papillary RCC (C, 10×), BCL1 IHC stained the squamoid cells (insert); Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (D, 40×), positive nuclear staining with GATA 3 (insert).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. MacLennan GT, Cheng L. Five decades of urologic pathology: the accelerating expansion of knowledge in renal cell neoplasia. Hum Pathol 2020;95:24-45. 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.09.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herbut PA. Urologic Pathology. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1952.
    1. Cheng L, Zhang S, MacLennan GT, et al. Molecular and cytogenetic insights into the pathogenesis, classification, differential diagnosis, and prognosis of renal epithelial neoplasms. Hum Pathol 2009;40:10-29. 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.09.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. WHO classification of tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs. Lyon, France: IARC; 2016. - PubMed
    1. Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, et al. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs—Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours. Eur Urol 2016;70:93-105. 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources