Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun;95(6):1867-1897.
doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03034-y. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies

Affiliations
Review

Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies

Francesca Pistollato et al. Arch Toxicol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

The EU Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and other EU regulations, such as REACH and the Cosmetic Products Regulation advocate for a change in the way toxicity testing is conducted. Whilst the Cosmetic Products Regulation bans animal testing altogether, REACH aims for a progressive shift from in vivo testing towards quantitative in vitro and computational approaches. Several endpoints can already be addressed using non-animal approaches including skin corrosion and irritation, serious eye damage and irritation, skin sensitisation, and mutagenicity and genotoxicity. However, for systemic effects such as acute toxicity, repeated dose toxicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity, evaluation of chemicals under REACH still heavily relies on animal tests. Here we summarise current EU regulatory requirements for the human health assessment of chemicals under REACH and the Cosmetic Products Regulation, considering the more critical endpoints and identifying the main challenges in introducing alternative methods into regulatory testing practice. This supports a recent initiative taken by the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM) to summarise current regulatory requirements specific for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products for several human health-related endpoints, with the aim of comparing different jurisdictions and coordinating the promotion and ultimately the implementation of non-animal approaches worldwide. Recent initiatives undertaken at European level to promote the 3Rs and the use of alternative methods in current regulatory practice are also discussed.

Keywords: 3Rs; Alternatives to animal testing; Cosmetic ingredients; Cosmetic products; Cosmetic products regulation; EU regulatory requirements; Human health; Industrial chemicals; REACH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bar graph summarising the numbers of available OECD Test Guidelines (TGs) addressing the assessment of the human health-related endpoints here described, comparing in vivo TGs (black bars) and in vitro/in chemico TGs (white bars)

References

    1. Adler S, Basketter D, Creton S, et al. Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010. Arch Toxicol. 2011;85(5):367–485. doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0693-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Archibald K, Tsaioun K, Kenna JG, Pound P. Better science for safer medicines: the human imperative. J R Soc Med. 2018 doi: 10.1177/0141076818812783. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balls M, Hellsten E. Statement on the scientific validity of the postimplantation rat whole-embryo culture assay—an in vitro test for embryotoxicity. Altern Lab Anim. 2002;30(3):271–273. doi: 10.1177/026119290203000301. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bal-Price A, Fritsche E. Editorial: developmental neurotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018;354:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.07.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bal-Price A, Pistollato F, Sachana M, Bopp SK, Munn S, Worth A. Strategies to improve the regulatory assessment of developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) using in vitro methods. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018;354:7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.02.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources