Impact of Individual, Organizational, and Technological Factors on the Implementation of an Online Portal to Support a Clinical Pathway Addressing Psycho-Oncology Care: Mixed Methods Study
- PMID: 33851926
- PMCID: PMC8082382
- DOI: 10.2196/26390
Impact of Individual, Organizational, and Technological Factors on the Implementation of an Online Portal to Support a Clinical Pathway Addressing Psycho-Oncology Care: Mixed Methods Study
Abstract
Background: Clinical pathways (CPs) can improve patient outcomes but can be complex to implement. Technologies, such as clinical decision support (CDS) tools, can facilitate their use, but require end-user testing in clinical settings.
Objective: This study applied the Technology Acceptance Model to evaluate the individual, organizational, and technological contexts impacting application of a portal to facilitate a CP for anxiety and depression (the ADAPT Portal) in a metropolitan cancer service. The ADAPT Portal triggers patient screening on patient reported outcomes, alerts staff to high scores, recommends evidence-based management, and triggers review and rescreening at set intervals.
Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data on portal activity, data accuracy, and health service staff perspectives were collected. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data.
Results: Overall, 15 (100% of those invited) health service staff agreed to be interviewed. During the pilot, 73 users (36 health service staff members and 37 patients) were registered on the ADAPT Portal. Of the 37 patients registered, 16 (43%) completed screening at least once, with seven screening positive and triaged appropriately. In total, 34 support requests were lodged, resulting in 17 portal enhancements (technical issues). Health service staff considered the ADAPT Portal easy to use and useful; however, some deemed it unnecessary or burdensome (individual issues), particularly in a busy cancer service (organizational issues).
Conclusions: User testing of a CDS to facilitate screening and assessment of anxiety and depression in cancer patients highlighted some technological issues in implementing the ADAPT CDS, resulting in 17 enhancements. Our results highlight the importance of obtaining health service staff feedback when piloting specialized CDS tools and addressing contextual factors when implementing them.
Keywords: clinical decision making; clinical pathways; decision support systems; health informatics; health services research; psycho-oncology.
©Lindy Masya, Heather L Shepherd, Phyllis Butow, Liesbeth Geerligs, Karen C Allison, Colette Dolan, Gabrielle Prest, The ADAPT Program Group, Joanne Shaw. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (http://humanfactors.jmir.org), 14.04.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Staff perspectives on the feasibility of a clinical pathway for anxiety and depression in cancer care, and mid-implementation adaptations.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07532-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35164772 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of implementation strategies to influence adherence to the clinical pathway for screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (ADAPT CP): study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 7;18(1):1077. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4962-9. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30404619 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Staff- and service-level factors associated with organisational readiness to implement a clinical pathway for the identification, assessment, and management of anxiety and depression in adults with cancer.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 15;23(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09829-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37582818 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Factors influencing national implementation of innovations within community pharmacy: a systematic review applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 4;14(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0867-5. Implement Sci. 2019. PMID: 30832698 Free PMC article.
-
What factors hinder the decision-making process for women with cancer and contemplating fertility preservation treatment?Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Jul 1;23(4):433-457. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx009. Hum Reprod Update. 2017. PMID: 28510760 Review.
Cited by
-
Staff perspectives on the feasibility of a clinical pathway for anxiety and depression in cancer care, and mid-implementation adaptations.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07532-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35164772 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Health Communication Strategies in Nursing: A Mixed Methods Study of Internet, mHealth, and Social Media Versus Traditional Methods.JMIR Nurs. 2024 Nov 19;7:e55744. doi: 10.2196/55744. JMIR Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39622705 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of core versus enhanced implementation strategies on adherence to a clinical pathway for managing anxiety and depression in cancer patients in routine care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.Implement Sci. 2023 May 22;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01269-0. Implement Sci. 2023. PMID: 37217928 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Fidelity and acceptability of implementation strategies developed for adherence to a clinical pathway for screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adults with cancer.Arch Public Health. 2024 May 6;82(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01293-6. Arch Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38711115 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability and appropriateness of a clinical pathway for managing anxiety and depression in cancer patients: a mixed methods study of staff perspectives.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 17;21(1):1243. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07252-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34789239 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Middleton B, Sittig DF, Wright A. Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision. Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Aug 02;Suppl 1:S103–16. doi: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s034. http://www.thieme-connect.com/DOI/DOI?10.15265/IYS-2016-s034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kinsman L, Rotter T, James E, Snow P, Willis J. What is a clinical pathway? Development of a definition to inform the debate. BMC Med. 2010 May 27;8:31. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-31. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7015-8-31 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous