Prevalence of and factors associated with physical restraint use in the intensive care unit: a multicenter prospective observational study in Japan
- PMID: 33852145
- DOI: 10.1007/s11739-021-02737-5
Prevalence of and factors associated with physical restraint use in the intensive care unit: a multicenter prospective observational study in Japan
Abstract
Physical restraint is widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to ensure patient safety despite its ethical implications. We performed a prospective observational study in six ICUs in Japan to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical restraint use in the ICU, a phenomenon that has not yet been reported on in Japan. Data were collected on 10 random days between November 2018 and February 2019. We evaluated physical restraint use in ICU patients aged ≥ 20 years during the data collection days. Among the 787 observations, the prevalence of physical restraint use was 32.9%; however, it was 41.5% in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The average age of patients was 68.5 years, and the average Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 19.4. Among the included patients, 52.1% received IMV, and 17.2% were diagnosed with delirium. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent factors [odds ratio (95% confidence interval)] associated with physical restraint use were age [1.02 (1.00-1.05)], APACHE II score [1.05 (1.01-1.09)], IMV [2.15 (1.16-4.01)], central venous catheter indwelling [2.66 (1.46-4.85)], sedative medication [2.98 (1.72-5.17)], agitation [7.83 (2.96-20.8)], and delirium [4.16 (2.37-7.29)]. Approximately one-third of the ICU patients required physical restraint in Japan. In addition, physical restraint use was influenced by disease severity, mental condition, and the medical apparatus used. Based on these findings, further investigations are imperative to develop strategies to reduce physical restraint use.
Keywords: Associated factors; Intensive care unit (ICU); Physical restraint; Prevalence.
© 2021. Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI).
References
-
- Maccioli GA, Dorman T, Brown BR et al (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the maintenance of patient physical safety in the intensive care unit: use of restraining therapies—American college of critical care medicine task force 2001–2002. Crit Care Med 31:2665–2676. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000095463.72353.ad - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kandeel NA, Attia AK (2013) Physical restraints practice in adult intensive care units in Egypt. Nurs Health Sci 15:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12000 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baumgarten M, Margolis DJ, Localio AR et al (2008) Extrinsic risk factors for pressure ulcers early in the hospital stay: a nested case-control study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:408–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/63.4.408 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mehta S, Cook D, Devlin JW et al (2015) Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of delirium in mechanically ventilated adults. Crit Care Med 43:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000000727 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jones C, Bäckman C, Capuzzo M et al (2007) Precipitants of post-traumatic stress disorder following intensive care: a hypothesis generating study of diversity in care. Intensive Care Med 33:978–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0600-8 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
