Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Sep;151(3):565-584.
doi: 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00229.x.

The molecular and genetic basis of pollen-pistil interactions

Affiliations
Free article
Review

The molecular and genetic basis of pollen-pistil interactions

M J Wheeler et al. New Phytol. 2001 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Over the past decade or so, there has been significant progress towards elucidating the molecular events occurring during pollination in flowering plants. This process involves a series of complex cellular interactions that culminates in the fusion between male and female gametes. The process also regulates crucial events such as pollen adhesion, hydration, pollen tube growth and guidance to the ovules. Additionally, in many instances, incompatibility mechanisms that control the acceptance or rejection of pollen alighting on a recipient plant play a major role in the pollination process. In this article we aim to review our current understanding of the components that are implicated in enabling the pollen to deliver the male gametes to the ovary and the molecular mechanisms by which they are thought to act. Contents Summary 565 I. Introduction 565 II. Adhesion of pollen to the stigma 566 III. Pollen hydration 567 IV. Pollen germination and initial growth on the stigma surface 568 V. Pollen tube growth through the style and pollen tube guidance 569 VI. Control of pollen viability by incompatibility responses 572 1. Self incompatibility (SI) 573 Gametophytic SI 573 SI in the Solanaceae 573 SI in Papaver 575 Sporophytic SI 577 SI in Brassica 577 SI in Ipomoea 579 2. Interspecific incompatibility responses 579 VII. Conclusions and perspective 580 References 580.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ai YJ, Singh A, Coleman CE, Ioerger TR, Kheyr-Pour A, Kao T-H. 1990. Self-incompatibility in Petunia inflata- isolation and characterization of cDNAs encoding 3 S-allele-associated proteins. Sexual Plant Reproduction 3: 130-138.
    1. Allen EA, Hazen BE, Hoch HC, Kwon Y, Leinhos GME, Staples RC, Stumpf MA, Terhume BT. 1991. Appressorium formation in response to topographical signals by 27 rust species. Phytopathology 81: 323-331.
    1. Anderson MA, Cornish EC, Mau S-L, Williams EG, Hoggart R, Atkinson A, Bonig I, Grego B, Simpson R, Roche PJ, Haley JD, Penschow JD, Niall HD, Tregear GW, Coghlan JP, Crawford RJ, Clarke AE. 1986. Cloning of cDNA for a stylar glycoprotein associated with expression of self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata. Nature 321: 38-44.
    1. Anderson MA, McFadden GI, Bernatzky R, Atkinson A, Orpin T, Dedman H, Tregear G, Fernley R, Clarke AE. 1989. Sequence variability of three alleles of the self-incompatibility gene of Nicotiana Alata. Plant Cell 1: 483-491. - PubMed
    1. Ascher PD & Peloquin SJ. 1968. Pollen tube growth and incompatibility following intra- and inter-specific pollinations in Lilium longiflorum. American Journal of Botany 55: 1230-1234.

LinkOut - more resources