Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e047676.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047676.

Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)

Affiliations

Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)

Rebecca H Maier et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Numbers of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery for severe mitral regurgitation have grown and will continue to rise. MVr is routinely performed via median sternotomy; however, there is a move towards less invasive surgical approaches.There is debate within the clinical and National Health Service (NHS) commissioning community about widespread adoption of minimally invasive MVr surgery in the absence of robust research evidence; implementation requires investment in staff and infrastructure.The UK Mini Mitral trial will provide definitive evidence comparing patient, NHS and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing MVr surgery. It will establish the best surgical approach for MVr, setting a standard against which emerging percutaneous techniques can be measured. Findings will inform optimisation of cost-effective practice.

Methods and analysis: UK Mini Mitral is a multicentre, expertise based randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive thoracoscopically guided right minithoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy for MVr. The trial is taking place in NHS cardiothoracic centres in the UK with established minimally invasive mitral valve surgery programmes. In each centre, consenting and eligible patients are randomised to receive surgery performed by consultant surgeons who meet protocol-defined surgical expertise criteria. Patients are followed for 1 year, and consent to longer term follow-up.Primary outcome is physical functioning 12 weeks following surgery, measured by change in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical functioning scale. Early and 1 year echo data will be reported by a core laboratory. Estimates of key clinical and health economic outcomes will be reported up to 5 years.The primary economic outcome is cost effectiveness, measured as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained over 52 weeks following index surgery.

Ethics and dissemination: A favourable opinion was given by Wales REC 6 (16/WA/0156). Trial findings will be disseminated to patients, clinicians, commissioning groups and through peer reviewed publication.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN13930454.

Keywords: cardiac surgery; cardiothoracic surgery; health economics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: LV was a member of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Clinical Evaluation and Trials Panel from 2015 to 2018.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
UK Mini Mitral Trial flow diagram. EQ-5D-5L, EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level; SF-36v2, Short Form Health Survey.

References

    1. McNeely CA, Vassileva CM. Long-Term outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement for degenerative disease: a systematic review. Curr Cardiol Rev 2015;11:157–62. 10.2174/1573403x10666140827093650 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gaur P, Kaneko T, McGurk S, et al. . Mitral valve repair versus replacement in the elderly: short-term and long-term outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1400–6. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.01.032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coutinho GF, Correia PM, Antunes MJ. Concomitant aortic and mitral surgery: to replace or repair the mitral valve? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1386–92. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Candan O, Ozdemir N, Aung SM, et al. . Effect of mitral valve repair versus replacement on left ventricular rotational deformation: a study with speckle tracking echocardiography. J Heart Valve Dis 2013;22:651–9. - PubMed
    1. Markar SR, Sadat U, Edmonds L, et al. . Mitral valve repair versus replacement in the elderly population. J Heart Valve Dis 2011;20:265–71. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources