NHS Health Check programme: a protocol for a realist review
- PMID: 33853809
- PMCID: PMC8054100
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048937
NHS Health Check programme: a protocol for a realist review
Abstract
Introduction: The NHS Health Check aims to identify individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) among the adult population in England. The Health Check includes calculation of CVD risk and discussion of pharmacological and lifestyle approaches to manage risk, including referral to lifestyle support services. The programme is commissioned by Local Authorities (LAs) and is delivered by a range of different providers in different settings. There is significant variation in activity, with uptake ranging from 25% to 85% in different areas, and clear evidence of variation in implementation and delivery practice.
Methods and analysis: We aim to understand how the NHS Health Check programme works in different settings, for different groups, so that we can recommend improvements to maximise intended outcomes. To do so, we will undertake a realist review and a survey of LA public health teams. Our review will follow Pawson's five iterative stages: (1) locate existing theories, (2) search for evidence, (3) article selection, (4) extract and organise data and (5) synthesise evidence and draw conclusions. Our review will include documents describing local implementation alongside published research studies. We will recruit a stakeholder group (including Public Health England, commissioners and providers of Health Checks, plus members of the public and patients) to advise us throughout. Our survey will be sent to all 152 LAs in England to gather detailed information on programme delivery (including COVID-19-related changes) and available referral services. This will enable us to map delivery across England and relate these data to programme outcomes.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this review. For the survey, we have received approval from the University of Kent Research Ethics Committee. Our findings will be used to develop recommendations on tailoring, implementation and design strategies to improve delivery of the NHS Health Check in different settings, for different groups.
Prospero registration number: CRD42020163822.
Keywords: preventive medicine; public health; risk management.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: CD and GW are both members of the Royal College of General Practitioners (UK) Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment Group. GW is an NHS General Practitioner and deputy chair of the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Prioritisation Committee: Integrated Community Health and Social Care Panel (A).
Figures
Similar articles
-
Understanding what happens to attendees after an NHS Health Check: a realist review.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 10;12(11):e064237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064237. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36357002 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What happens after an NHS Health Check? A survey and realist review.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(12):1-133. doi: 10.3310/RGTH4127. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37830173 Review.
-
Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(35):1-234. doi: 10.3310/hta25350. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 34076574 Free PMC article.
-
The NHS Health Check programme: a survey of programme delivery in England before and after the Covid-19 pandemic response.NIHR Open Res. 2023 Aug 25;3:32. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13436.2. eCollection 2023. NIHR Open Res. 2023. PMID: 37881459 Free PMC article.
-
Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience (RReHOPE): a realist review protocol.BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 8;13(3):e068544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068544. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 36889822 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Modelling a two-stage adult population screen for autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolaemia: cross-sectional analysis within the UK Biobank.BMJ Public Health. 2023 Oct 29;1(1):e000021. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000021. eCollection 2023 Nov. BMJ Public Health. 2023. PMID: 40017868 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding primary care diagnosis and management of sleep disturbance for people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a realist review protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):e067424. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067424. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36400725 Free PMC article.
-
Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 16;12(11):e066650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066650. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36385017 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): Protocol for a realist review.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0304626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304626. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39052681 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding what happens to attendees after an NHS Health Check: a realist review.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 10;12(11):e064237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064237. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36357002 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- NHS . Who’s at higher risk from coronavirus, 2020. Available: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/people-at-higher-risk...
-
- Cabinet Office . Our plan to rebuild: The UK Government’s COVID-19 recovery strategy, 2020.
-
- NHS . NHS health check, 2020. Available: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/nhs-health-check/
-
- Public Health England . NHS health check implementation review and action plan summary, 2013.
-
- Public Health England . NHS health check programme standards: a framework for quality improvement. 2020, 2020.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources