Determinants of Infodemics During Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 33855006
- PMCID: PMC8039137
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.603603
Determinants of Infodemics During Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: The widespread use of social media represents an unprecedented opportunity for health promotion. We have more information and evidence-based health related knowledge, for instance about healthy habits or possible risk behaviors. However, these tools also carry some disadvantages since they also open the door to new social and health risks, in particular during health emergencies. This systematic review aims to study the determinants of infodemics during disease outbreaks, drawing on both quantitative and qualitative methods. Methods: We searched research articles in PubMed, Scopus, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Sociological abstracts, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Additional research works were included by searching bibliographies of electronically retrieved review articles. Results: Finally, 42 studies were included in the review. Five determinants of infodemics were identified: (1) information sources; (2) online communities' structure and consensus; (3) communication channels (i.e., mass media, social media, forums, and websites); (4) messages content (i.e., quality of information, sensationalism, etc.,); and (5) context (e.g., social consensus, health emergencies, public opinion, etc.). Studied selected in this systematic review identified different measures to combat misinformation during outbreaks. Conclusion: The clarity of the health promotion messages has been proven essential to prevent the spread of a particular disease and to avoid potential risks, but it is also fundamental to understand the network structure of social media platforms and the emergency context where misinformation might dynamically evolve. Therefore, in order to prevent future infodemics, special attention will need to be paid both to increase the visibility of evidence-based knowledge generated by health organizations and academia, and to detect the possible sources of mis/disinformation.
Keywords: epidemics; infodemics; misinformation; outbreaks; social media.
Copyright © 2021 Alvarez-Galvez, Suarez-Lledo and Rojas-Garcia.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33470931 Free PMC article.
-
Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak.BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32375715 Free PMC article.
-
Framework for Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Methods and Results of an Online, Crowdsourced WHO Technical Consultation.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e19659. doi: 10.2196/19659. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32558655 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media.Soc Sci Med. 2019 Nov;240:112552. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552. Epub 2019 Sep 18. Soc Sci Med. 2019. PMID: 31561111 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Communication to promote and support physical distancing for COVID-19 prevention and control.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD015144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015144. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37811673 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A conceptual model on caregivers' hesitancy of topical fluoride for their children.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0282834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282834. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36947522 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Role of Social Bots During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infodemic, Disagreement, and Criticism.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 25;24(8):e36085. doi: 10.2196/36085. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35839385 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Communication in the Alert Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of News Flow at National and Global Levels.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 4;19(15):9588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159588. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35954944 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement, Characterization, and Mapping of COVID-19 Misinformation in Spain: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jun 16;5:e69945. doi: 10.2196/69945. JMIR Infodemiology. 2025. PMID: 40523274 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO . EPI-WIN (2020). Available online at: https://www.epi-win.com/ (accessed March 9, 2020).
-
- de Boer C. Public Opinion. In: Ritzer G, editor. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. New York, NY: Blackwell Publishing. (2007). 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp119 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources