Comparison of glucose/electrolyte and glucose/glycine/electrolyte oral rehydration solutions in hospitalized children with diarrhea in Costa Rica
- PMID: 3385554
- DOI: 10.1097/00005176-198805000-00017
Comparison of glucose/electrolyte and glucose/glycine/electrolyte oral rehydration solutions in hospitalized children with diarrhea in Costa Rica
Abstract
The experience of Nalin et al. and Patra et al. with a "super oral rehydration solution (ORS)" containing glucose plus glycine to enhance the intestinal absorption of sodium and water prompted us to investigate a similar ORS containing the standard World Health Organization (WHO/ORS) plus either 55 or 110 mmol/L glycine in infants and small children with noncholera diarrhea. We did not find a statistically significant difference between the glycine-fortified ORS and the standard WHO/ORS with respect to the clinical outcome and composition of serum electrolytes.
PIP: Oral rehydration solutions containing the WHO recommended mixture alone, or with 111 mmol/L glycine or 55 mmol/L glycine were compared for treatment of 30 male children aged 1-24 months with clinical diarrheal dehydration in the emergency room of the National Children's Hospital, San Jose, Costa Rica. ORS volume was estimated by doubling the degree of dehydration judged clinically, offered by teaspoons over 4 hours. Children that could not tolerate oral solution were given ORS by nasogastric tube. Those with hypokalemia 3 mmol/L were given a solution containing 20 mmol/L K+ or iv fluid. The time to rehydration averaged 9.45 hours with the WHO solution, 10.2 hours with the low glycine ORS and 8.95 with the high glycine ORS (n.s.). Percent body weight gain did not differ significantly. The average stool weight and urine excretion were lower in the high glycine group, not significantly. 3 children developed mild hypernatremia, but normalized without additional treatment. Thus, glycine-fortified ORS made no significant difference in clinical outcome or serum electrolytes in this series.
Comment in
-
Comparison of oral rehydration solutions.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1989 Feb;8(2):272-6. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1989. PMID: 2709258 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of efficacy of a glucose/glycine/glycylglycine electrolyte solution versus the standard WHO/ORS in diarrheic dehydrated children.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988 Nov-Dec;7(6):882-8. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198811000-00016. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988. PMID: 3199275 Clinical Trial.
-
A double-blind clinical trial comparing World Health Organization oral rehydration solution with a reduced osmolarity solution containing equal amounts of sodium and glucose.J Pediatr. 1996 Jan;128(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70426-2. J Pediatr. 1996. PMID: 8551420 Clinical Trial.
-
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a reduced osmolarity oral rehydration salts solution in children with acute watery diarrhea.Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):613-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.613. Pediatrics. 2001. PMID: 11335732 Clinical Trial.
-
Usefulness of ORT in certain special situations of diarrhoeal diseases.Indian J Public Health. 1994 Apr-Jun;38(2):44-9. Indian J Public Health. 1994. PMID: 7835995 Review.
-
[Sodium concentrations in solutions for oral rehydration in children with diarrhea].Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1990 Apr;47(4):285-91. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1990. PMID: 2189440 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Issues and Controversies in the Evolution of Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT).Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 12;6(1):34. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6010034. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33809275 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous