Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 14;8(1):27.
doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00346-x.

Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review

Hans Van Eetvelde et al. J Exp Orthop. .

Abstract

Purpose: Injuries are common in sports and can have significant physical, psychological and financial consequences. Machine learning (ML) methods could be used to improve injury prediction and allow proper approaches to injury prevention. The aim of our study was therefore to perform a systematic review of ML methods in sport injury prediction and prevention.

Methods: A search of the PubMed database was performed on March 24th 2020. Eligible articles included original studies investigating the role of ML for sport injury prediction and prevention. Two independent reviewers screened articles, assessed eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. Methodological quality and risk of bias were determined by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study quality was evaluated using the GRADE working group methodology.

Results: Eleven out of 249 studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Different ML methods were used (tree-based ensemble methods (n = 9), Support Vector Machines (n = 4), Artificial Neural Networks (n = 2)). The classification methods were facilitated by preprocessing steps (n = 5) and optimized using over- and undersampling methods (n = 6), hyperparameter tuning (n = 4), feature selection (n = 3) and dimensionality reduction (n = 1). Injury predictive performance ranged from poor (Accuracy = 52%, AUC = 0.52) to strong (AUC = 0.87, f1-score = 85%).

Conclusions: Current ML methods can be used to identify athletes at high injury risk and be helpful to detect the most important injury risk factors. Methodological quality of the analyses was sufficient in general, but could be further improved. More effort should be put in the interpretation of the ML models.

Keywords: Injury prediction; Injury prevention; Machine Learning; Sport injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic figure of the Machine Learning approach. The entire Machine Learning process is shown. Parts in dotted shapes are optional or not always necessary
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PRISMA flow chart

References

    1. Adetiba E, Iweanya VC, Popoola SI, Adetiba JN, Menon C. Automated detection of heart defects in athletes based on electrocardiography and artificial neural network. Cogent Eng. 2017;4:1411220. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2017.1411220. - DOI
    1. Ayala F, López-Valenciano A, Gámez Martín JA, De Ste CM, Vera-Garcia FJ, García-Vaquero MDP, Ruiz-Pérez I, Myer GD. A Preventive Model for Hamstring Injuries in Professional Soccer: Learning Algorithms. Int J Sports Med. 2019;40:344–353. doi: 10.1055/a-0826-1955. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bahr R, Clarsen B, Ekstrand J. Why we should focus on the burden of injuries and illnesses, not just their incidence. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:1018–1021. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Understanding injury mechanisms: a key component of preventing injuries in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:324–329. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.018341. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartlett JD, O’Connor F, Pitchford N, Torres-Ronda L, Robertson SJ. Relationships Between Internal and External Training Load in Team-Sport Athletes: Evidence for an Individualized Approach. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12:230–234. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0791. - DOI - PubMed