Competence assessment of the clinical tutor: a multicentric observational study
- PMID: 33855981
- PMCID: PMC8138801
- DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11445
Competence assessment of the clinical tutor: a multicentric observational study
Abstract
Background and aim of the study: In the international literature there are no validated tools which investigate clinical tutors' skills. The main objective of the study has been to describe the clinical nurse tutor's skills, required to properly train nursing students during their educational path.
Methods: In this observational study a non-probability sampling has been used. The study was led in two centers: the AOUPR of Parma and the AUSL of Parma, after obtaining the favorable opinion from the Ethics Committee of the Northern Emilia Large Section. The data have been collected by using a structured and self-given survey that investigated three areas. Each item has a 4-point Likert scale, in which 1 indicates "for nothing" and 4 "very much". The data have been analyzed with the statistical software IBM SPSS v.26 ® and with the open-source statistical software Jamovi v.1.6.9 (https://www.jamovi.org.). The number of factors in the original model was reduced using several established research steps and then evaluated for data quality and construct validity using principal component analysis and confimatory factor analysis.
Results: Among 397 administered questionnaires, only 300, which were considered valid, have been filled. The psychometric properties of the investigation tool turned out to be good in all the areas analyzed with a Cronbach alpha higher than 0.70. The extensive process resulted in a version with 4 factors.
Conclusions: Nurses' answers have allowed to draw the required profile of the clinical tutors in the different organizational contexts. The results can target possible training proposals to create opportunities for the clinical tutors.
Conflict of interest statement
Each author declares that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangement etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
References
-
- Palese A, et al. Lo strumento italiano di misurazione della qualità dell’apprendimento clinico degli studenti infermieri. [The Italian tool for measuring the quality of clinical learning in nursing students] Assist Inferm Ric. 2017;1(36):41–50. - PubMed
-
- Conferenza Permanente delle Classi di Laurea delle Professioni Sanitarie. Documento di indirizzo su standard e principi del tirocinio nei Corso di Laurea delle Professioni Sanitarie. [Permanent Conference of Degree Classes of Health Professions. Guidance Document on standards and principles of internship in the CL of the Health Professions] Med. Chir. 2009;47:2036–2045.
-
- Mortari L. Apprendere dall’esperienza. Il pensare riflessivo nella formazione [Learning from experience. Reflective thinking in training] Carocci. 2003
-
- Zannini L. La tutorship nella formazione degli adulti. Uno sguardo pedagogico [Tutorship in adult education: a pedagogical perspective] Guerini Scientifica. 2005
-
- Gamberoni L, Marmo G, Bozzolan M, Loss C, Valentini O. Apprendimento clinico, riflessività e tutorato. Metodi e strumenti della didattica tutoriale per le professioni sanitarie [Clinical learning, reflexivity and mentoring. Tutorial teaching methods and tools for health professions] EdiSES. 2009
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
