Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;10(1):711-727.
doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00255-y. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

Switching From Pregabalin to Mirogabalin in Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Multi-Center, Prospective, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study (MIROP Study)

Affiliations

Switching From Pregabalin to Mirogabalin in Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Multi-Center, Prospective, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study (MIROP Study)

Yoshiyuki Kimura et al. Pain Ther. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Mirogabalin, which is a selective ligand of the α2δ subunit of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, was recently approved in Japan for peripheral neuropathic pain. The α2δ ligands, including mirogabalin and pregabalin, are associated with significant risk of adverse events (AEs) such as somnolence or dizziness, leading to poor compliance and subsequent inefficacy. Safety and efficacy data for switching patients from pregabalin to mirogabalin are scarce.

Methods: This prospective, single-arm, open-label study involving ten participating centers in Japan recruited patients aged ≥ 20 years with peripheral neuropathic pain [visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 40 mm]. Where necessary, patients underwent a 1-week tapering period to reduce their pregabalin dose, after which pregabalin was stopped and mirogabalin dose was increased using a step-wise dose titration. Patients underwent dose increases after the first and second weeks if there were no tolerability issues, followed by the effective doses until the end of the study (4 weeks). The primary endpoint was the incidence of somnolence, dizziness, and peripheral edema; secondary endpoints included changes in VAS score. AEs were monitored for safety.

Results: Of 157 patients who provided informed consent, 152 patients were enrolled; 136 (89.5%) patients completed the study. The overall incidences of somnolence, dizziness, and peripheral edema were 41.4, 15.8, and 2.6%, respectively. Most patients (> 70%) experienced mild AEs, and one patient experienced a severe AE (dizziness). Most patients (> 70%) were able to achieve dose titration to an effective dose. Overall mean VAS score significantly decreased (Δ15.7 mm, p < 0.0001) by the end of the study.

Conclusions: Mirogabalin switching from pregabalin is well tolerated and effective in pain management for peripheral neuropathic pain using a step-wise titration.

Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031190113).

Keywords: Mirogabalin; Peripheral neuropathic pain; Pregabalin; Switching; α2δ ligands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. a ± 7 days; i.e., dose-adjustment period could begin anywhere between days 9 and 22. b ± 7 days; i.e., end of study occurred anywhere between days 22 and 36. BID twice daily, CrCL creatinine clearance
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient disposition. aPatients may have had multiple reasons for withdrawal
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cumulative incidence of somnolence, dizziness, and peripheral edema (safety analysis set; N = 152)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pain intensity (VAS score) from study enrollment to end of study (efficacy analysis set; N = 151). Data are mean ± standard deviation. a ± 7 days; i.e., dose-adjustment period could begin anywhere between days 9 and 22. b ± 7 days; i.e., end of study occurred anywhere between days 22 and 36. ***p < 0.001 vs. baseline using a paired t test. VAS visual analog scale

References

    1. Jensen TS, Baron R, Haanpää M, et al. A new definition of neuropathic pain. Pain. 2011;152(10):2204–2205. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galluzzi KE. Managing neuropathic pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007;107(10 Suppl 6):39–Es48. - PubMed
    1. O’Connor AB. Neuropathic pain: quality-of-life impact, costs and cost effectiveness of therapy. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(2):95–112. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200927020-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):162–173. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70251-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tölle TR. painDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22(10):1911–1920. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132488. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources