Patterns of Media Use, Strength of Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories, and the Prevention of COVID-19 From March to July 2020 in the United States: Survey Study
- PMID: 33857008
- PMCID: PMC8083953
- DOI: 10.2196/25215
Patterns of Media Use, Strength of Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories, and the Prevention of COVID-19 From March to July 2020 in the United States: Survey Study
Abstract
Background: Holding conspiracy beliefs regarding the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States has been associated with reductions in both actions to prevent the spread of the infection (eg, mask wearing) and intentions to accept a vaccine when one becomes available. Patterns of media use have also been associated with acceptance of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs. Here we ask whether the type of media on which a person relies increased, decreased, or had no additional effect on that person's COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs over a 4-month period.
Objective: We used panel data to explore whether use of conservative and social media in the United States, which were previously found to be positively related to holding conspiracy beliefs about the origins and prevention of COVID-19, were associated with a net increase in the strength of those beliefs from March to July of 2020. We also asked whether mainstream news sources, which were previously found to be negatively related to belief in pandemic-related conspiracies, were associated with a net decrease in the strength of such beliefs over the study period. Additionally, we asked whether subsequent changes in pandemic conspiracy beliefs related to the use of media were also related to subsequent mask wearing and vaccination intentions.
Methods: A survey that we conducted with a national US probability sample in March of 2020 and again in July with the same 840 respondents assessed belief in pandemic-related conspiracies, use of various types of media information sources, actions taken to prevent the spread of the disease and intentions to vaccinate, and various demographic characteristics. Change across the two waves was analyzed using path analytic techniques.
Results: We found that conservative media use predicted an increase in conspiracy beliefs (β=.17, 99% CI .10-.25) and that reliance on mainstream print predicted a decrease in their belief (β=-.08, 99% CI -.14 to -.02). Although many social media platforms reported downgrading or removing false or misleading content, ongoing use of such platforms by respondents predicted growth in conspiracy beliefs as well (β=.072, 99% CI .018-.123). Importantly, conspiracy belief changes related to media use between the two waves of the study were associated with the uptake of mask wearing and changes in vaccination intentions in July. Unlike other media, use of mainstream broadcast television predicted greater mask wearing (β=.17, 99% CI .09-.26) and vaccination intention (β=.08, 95% CI .02-.14), independent of conspiracy beliefs.
Conclusions: The findings point to the need for greater efforts on the part of commentators, reporters, and guests on conservative media to report verifiable information about the pandemic. The results also suggest that social media platforms need to be more aggressive in downgrading, blocking, and counteracting claims about COVID-19 vaccines, claims about mask wearing, and conspiracy beliefs that have been judged problematic by public health authorities.
Keywords: COVID-19; United States; belief; broadcast news media; conservative media; conspiracy beliefs; infodemic; intention; mask wearing; misinformation; prevention; print news media; social media; vaccination.
©Daniel Romer, Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 27.04.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113356. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356. Epub 2020 Sep 21. Soc Sci Med. 2020. PMID: 32967786 Free PMC article.
-
Conspiratorial thinking, selective exposure to conservative media, and response to COVID-19 in the US.Soc Sci Med. 2021 Dec;291:114480. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114480. Epub 2021 Oct 12. Soc Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 34662759 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating and Improving the Accuracy of US Citizens' Beliefs About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 12;23(1):e24069. doi: 10.2196/24069. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33351776 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative theories of COVID-19: social dimensions and information sources.J Public Health Policy. 2025 Jun;46(2):444-459. doi: 10.1057/s41271-025-00560-2. Epub 2025 Feb 19. J Public Health Policy. 2025. PMID: 39972218 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Summarising data and factors associated with COVID-19 related conspiracy theories in the first year of the pandemic: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 1;10(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00959-6. BMC Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36320071 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Profiles in conspiracism: Associations with two psychiatric syndromes, religiosity and pandemic-related health behaviors.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 18;13:996582. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.996582. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 36329916 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Vaccine Concerns about Safety, Effectiveness, and Policies in the United States, Canada, Sweden, and Italy among Unvaccinated Individuals.Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Oct 6;9(10):1138. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101138. Vaccines (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34696245 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative publication metrics in the time of COVID-19.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2021 Aug 23;35(1):43-45. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2021.1963184. eCollection 2022. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2021. PMID: 34970030 Free PMC article.
-
Conspiracy narratives and vaccine hesitancy: a scoping review of prevalence, impact, and interventions.BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):3325. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20797-y. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39609773 Free PMC article.
-
On the relationship between conspiracy theory beliefs, misinformation, and vaccine hesitancy.PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276082. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36288357 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hall Jamieson K, Albarracín D. The Relation between Media Consumption and Misinformation at the Outset of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in the US. HKS Misinfo Review. 2020 Apr 17;1(2):1–22. doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-012. - DOI
-
- Miller JM. Do COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory Beliefs Form a Monological Belief System? Can J Pol Sci. 2020 May 21;53(2):319–326. doi: 10.1017/S0008423920000517. - DOI
-
- Stephens M. A geospatial infodemic: Mapping Twitter conspiracy theories of COVID-19. Dialogues in Human Geography. 2020 Jun 23;10(2):276–281. doi: 10.1177/2043820620935683. - DOI
-
- Uscinski JE, Enders AM, Klofstad C, Seelig M, Funchion J, Everett C, Wuchty S, Premaratne K, Murthi M. Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories? HKS Misinfo Review. 2020 Apr 28;:1–12. doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-015. - DOI
-
- Hofstadter R. The Paranoid Style in American Politics. New York: Vintage Books; 2008.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical