Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 27;23(4):e25215.
doi: 10.2196/25215.

Patterns of Media Use, Strength of Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories, and the Prevention of COVID-19 From March to July 2020 in the United States: Survey Study

Affiliations

Patterns of Media Use, Strength of Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories, and the Prevention of COVID-19 From March to July 2020 in the United States: Survey Study

Daniel Romer et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Holding conspiracy beliefs regarding the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States has been associated with reductions in both actions to prevent the spread of the infection (eg, mask wearing) and intentions to accept a vaccine when one becomes available. Patterns of media use have also been associated with acceptance of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs. Here we ask whether the type of media on which a person relies increased, decreased, or had no additional effect on that person's COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs over a 4-month period.

Objective: We used panel data to explore whether use of conservative and social media in the United States, which were previously found to be positively related to holding conspiracy beliefs about the origins and prevention of COVID-19, were associated with a net increase in the strength of those beliefs from March to July of 2020. We also asked whether mainstream news sources, which were previously found to be negatively related to belief in pandemic-related conspiracies, were associated with a net decrease in the strength of such beliefs over the study period. Additionally, we asked whether subsequent changes in pandemic conspiracy beliefs related to the use of media were also related to subsequent mask wearing and vaccination intentions.

Methods: A survey that we conducted with a national US probability sample in March of 2020 and again in July with the same 840 respondents assessed belief in pandemic-related conspiracies, use of various types of media information sources, actions taken to prevent the spread of the disease and intentions to vaccinate, and various demographic characteristics. Change across the two waves was analyzed using path analytic techniques.

Results: We found that conservative media use predicted an increase in conspiracy beliefs (β=.17, 99% CI .10-.25) and that reliance on mainstream print predicted a decrease in their belief (β=-.08, 99% CI -.14 to -.02). Although many social media platforms reported downgrading or removing false or misleading content, ongoing use of such platforms by respondents predicted growth in conspiracy beliefs as well (β=.072, 99% CI .018-.123). Importantly, conspiracy belief changes related to media use between the two waves of the study were associated with the uptake of mask wearing and changes in vaccination intentions in July. Unlike other media, use of mainstream broadcast television predicted greater mask wearing (β=.17, 99% CI .09-.26) and vaccination intention (β=.08, 95% CI .02-.14), independent of conspiracy beliefs.

Conclusions: The findings point to the need for greater efforts on the part of commentators, reporters, and guests on conservative media to report verifiable information about the pandemic. The results also suggest that social media platforms need to be more aggressive in downgrading, blocking, and counteracting claims about COVID-19 vaccines, claims about mask wearing, and conspiracy beliefs that have been judged problematic by public health authorities.

Keywords: COVID-19; United States; belief; broadcast news media; conservative media; conspiracy beliefs; infodemic; intention; mask wearing; misinformation; prevention; print news media; social media; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standardized predictors of conspiracy beliefs in March and again in July with all coefficients falling within 99% CIs, except for social media and conspiracy beliefs in March.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standardized relations between media use in March and subsequent conspiracy beliefs and action taken to prevent spread of COVID infection in July. All paths within 99% CIs, except between social media and conspiracy beliefs in March, which excluded zero with a 95% CI.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Standardized relations between media use in March and conspiracy beliefs and vaccine intentions in July. All paths within 99% CIs, except between social media and conspiracy beliefs in March and July, which excluded zero at the 95% CI.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hall Jamieson K, Albarracín D. The Relation between Media Consumption and Misinformation at the Outset of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in the US. HKS Misinfo Review. 2020 Apr 17;1(2):1–22. doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-012. - DOI
    1. Miller JM. Do COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory Beliefs Form a Monological Belief System? Can J Pol Sci. 2020 May 21;53(2):319–326. doi: 10.1017/S0008423920000517. - DOI
    1. Stephens M. A geospatial infodemic: Mapping Twitter conspiracy theories of COVID-19. Dialogues in Human Geography. 2020 Jun 23;10(2):276–281. doi: 10.1177/2043820620935683. - DOI
    1. Uscinski JE, Enders AM, Klofstad C, Seelig M, Funchion J, Everett C, Wuchty S, Premaratne K, Murthi M. Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories? HKS Misinfo Review. 2020 Apr 28;:1–12. doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-015. - DOI
    1. Hofstadter R. The Paranoid Style in American Politics. New York: Vintage Books; 2008.