Cervical Cancer Screening-Past, Present, and Future
- PMID: 33857013
- DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1628
Cervical Cancer Screening-Past, Present, and Future
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening has undergone a transformation in recent decades. Historically, programs were based on cervical cytology (i.e., "Pap smear"), which had to be repeated often because of its limited sensitivity and reproducibility. In more recent years, the discovery of human papillomavirus (HPV) as the necessary cause of virtually all cervical cancers has led to the introduction of HPV testing into clinical practice, first as a triage test for minor cytologic abnormalities, then in conjunction with cervical cytology (cotesting), and most recently, as a standalone screening test. Multiple randomized trials have shown that HPV-based screening has higher sensitivity compared with cytology, providing great reassurance against cervical precancer and cancer for women testing HPV-negative for many years. Analyses have also been conducted in support of the recent U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines that show that primary HPV screening achieves the greatest balance of benefits and harms compared with other strategies. An added benefit of primary HPV testing is the ability to conduct it from self-collected samples, which is critical for extending coverage among hard-to-reach individuals and could provide a safe and effective alternative to in-person screening visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.See related article by Liang et al., p. 474.
©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.
Comment in
-
Cervical Cancer Screening: Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear Test, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Human Papillomavirus Testing as Stand-alone or Cotesting Strategies.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Mar;30(3):474-484. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1003. Epub 2020 Nov 13. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021. PMID: 33187968
Comment on
-
Cervical Cancer Screening: Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear Test, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Human Papillomavirus Testing as Stand-alone or Cotesting Strategies.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Mar;30(3):474-484. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1003. Epub 2020 Nov 13. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021. PMID: 33187968
Similar articles
-
Relative Performance of HPV and Cytology Components of Cotesting in Cervical Screening.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 1;110(5):501-508. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx225. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018. PMID: 29145648 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical cancer screening with both human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou testing vs Papanicolaou testing alone: what screening intervals are physicians recommending?Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 14;170(11):977-85. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.134. Arch Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20548011
-
Glandular Lesions of the Cervix in Clinical Practice: A Cytology, Histology, and Human Papillomavirus Correlation Study From 2 Institutions.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Nov;139(11):1431-6. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0633-OA. Epub 2015 May 7. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015. PMID: 25951104
-
Comparative assessment of test characteristics of cervical cancer screening methods for implementation in low-resource settings.Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106883. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106883. Epub 2021 Nov 14. Prev Med. 2022. PMID: 34785209 Review.
-
Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries.Vaccine. 2008 Aug 19;26 Suppl 10:K29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.019. Vaccine. 2008. PMID: 18847555 Review.
Cited by
-
Updated European guidelines for clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP), gastric adenocarcinoma, proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS) and other rare adenomatous polyposis syndromes: a joint EHTG-ESCP revision.Br J Surg. 2024 May 3;111(5):znae070. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae070. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38722804 Free PMC article.
-
A Preliminary Study on Exploring a potential Ultrasound Method for Predicting Cervical Cancer.J Cancer. 2022 Jan 1;13(3):793-799. doi: 10.7150/jca.60413. eCollection 2022. J Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35154448 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of COVID-19 on cervical cancer screening: Challenges and opportunities to improving resilience and reduce disparities.Prev Med. 2021 Oct;151:106596. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106596. Epub 2021 Jun 30. Prev Med. 2021. PMID: 34217415 Free PMC article.
-
An innovative glutamine metabolism-related gene signature for predicting prognosis and immune landscape in cervical cancer.Discov Oncol. 2025 Mar 20;16(1):368. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02109-x. Discov Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40113615 Free PMC article.
-
6-Shogaol as a Novel Thioredoxin Reductase Inhibitor Induces Oxidative-Stress-Mediated Apoptosis in HeLa Cells.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 4;24(5):4966. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054966. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36902397 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Liang LA, Einzmann T, Franzen A, Schwarzer K, Schauberger G, Schriefer D, et al. Cervical cancer screening: comparison of conventional Pap smear test, liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing as stand-alone or co-testing strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30:474–84.
-
- Schiffman M, Doorbar J, Wentzensen N, de Sanjose S, Fakhry C, Monk BJ, et al. Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16086.
-
- Fontham ETH, Wolf AMD, Church TR, Etzioni R, Flowers CR, Herzig A, et al. Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:321–46.
-
- Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, et al. Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;320:674–86.
-
- Melnikow J, Henderson JT, Burda BU, Senger CA, Durbin S, Weyrich MS. Screening for cervical cancer with high-risk human papillomavirus testing: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018;320:687–705.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous