Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 15;11(4):e046331.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046331.

Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review

Affiliations

Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review

Rakesh Narendra Modi et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Screening programmes represent a considerable amount of healthcare activity. As complex interventions, they require careful delivery to generate net benefit. Much screening work occurs in primary care. Despite intensive study of intervention delivery in primary care, there is currently no synthesis of the delivery of screening programmes in this setting. The purpose of this review is to describe and critically evaluate the delivery of screening programmes in general practice and community services.

Methods and analysis: We will use scoping review methods to explore which components of screening programmes are delivered in primary care and systematic review methods to locate and synthesise evidence on how screening programmes can be delivered in primary care, including barriers, facilitators and strategies. We will include empirical studies of any design which consider screening programmes in high-income countries, based in part or whole in primary care. We will search 20 information sources from 1 January 2000, including those relating to health (eg, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL), management (eg, Rx for change database) and grey literature (eg, OpenGrey, screening committee websites). Two reviewers will screen citations and full texts of potentially eligible studies and assess these against inclusion criteria. Qualitative and quantitative data will be extracted in duplicate and synthesised using a best fit framework approach. Within the systematic review, the mixed methods appraisal tool will be used to assess risk of bias.

Ethics and dissemination: No ethics approval is required. We will disseminate findings to academics through publication and presentation, to decision-makers through national screening bodies, to practitioners through professional bodies, and to the public through social media.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020215420.

Keywords: health policy; preventive medicine; primary care; public health; statistics & research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RNM, SH, AP, JM and JB are undertaking a trial of Atrial Fibrillation Screening funded by the National Institute for Health Research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Explanation of the role of best fit frameworks in the syntheses for the scoping and systematic reviews on the delivery of screening programmes in primary care.

Similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization . Screening. World Health Organization, 2019. https://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/screening/en/
    1. Public Health England . NHS population screening explained, 2013. Available: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/nhs-population-screening-explained [Accessed 16 Dec 2019].
    1. Raffle AE, Mackie A, Gray JAM. Screening: evidence and practice. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019: 14–15.
    1. Public Health England . NHS screening programmes in England. Public Health England, 2016.
    1. Office for National Statistics . Population estimates for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: mid-2015. Office for National Statistics, 2016. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigrati...

Publication types