Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jul 1;37(7):524-537.
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000943.

Clinical Relevance of Epidural Steroid Injections on Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome-related Synptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Thomas M de Bruijn  1   2 , Ingrid B de Groot  2 , Harald S Miedema  2   3 , Johan Haumann  4 , Raymond W J G Ostelo  1   5
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Clinical Relevance of Epidural Steroid Injections on Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome-related Synptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Thomas M de Bruijn et al. Clin J Pain. .

Abstract

Objectives: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) can be used to reduce lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) related pain. The clinical relevance of ESIs are currently unknown. This systematic review and meta-analyses aims to assess whether ESIs are clinically relevant for patients with LRS.

Materials and methods: Comprehensive literature searches for randomized controlled trials regarding steroid injections for LRS were conducted in PudMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL from their inception to September 2018 (December 2019 for PubMed). For each homogenous comparison, the outcomes function, pain intensity and health-related quality of life at different follow-up intervals were pooled separately. The GRADE approach was used to determine the overall certainty of the evidence.

Results: Seventeen studies were included. Two different homogenous comparisons were identified for which the randomized controlled trials could be pooled. In 36 of the 40 analyses no clinically relevant effect was found. The certainty of evidence varied between very low to high. Four analyses found a clinically relevant effect, all on pain intensity and health-related quality of life, but the certainty of the evidence was either low or very low. Two of the 33 subgroup analyses showed a clinically relevant effect. However, according to the GRADE approach the certainty of these findings are low to very low.

Discussion: On the basis of the analyses we conclude there is insufficient evidence that ESIs for patients with LRS are clinically relevant at any follow-up moment. High-quality studies utilizing a predefined clinical success are necessary to identify potential clinically relevant effects of ESIs. Until the results of these studies are available, there is reason to consider whether the current daily practice of ESIs for patients with LRS should continue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the study search and selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). Classification of Chronic Pain, Second Edition (Revised). Available at: https://www.iasp-pain.org/PublicationsNews/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1673. Accessed March 15, 2019.
    1. Iversen T, Solberg TK, Romner B, et al. . Accuracy of physical examination for chronic lumbar radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Peul WC. Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. BMJ. 2007;334:1313–1317. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stirling ER, Patel MS, Sell PJ. Sciatica. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016;77:C180–C183. - PubMed
    1. Ropper AH, Zafonte RD. Sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1240–1248. - PubMed