Two views on the cognitive brain
- PMID: 33859408
- DOI: 10.1038/s41583-021-00448-6
Two views on the cognitive brain
Erratum in
-
Publisher Correction: Two views of the cognitive brain.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Aug;22(8):516. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00487-z. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34140666 No abstract available.
Abstract
Cognition can be defined as computation over meaningful representations in the brain to produce adaptive behaviour. There are two views on the relationship between cognition and the brain that are largely implicit in the literature. The Sherringtonian view seeks to explain cognition as the result of operations on signals performed at nodes in a network and passed between them that are implemented by specific neurons and their connections in circuits in the brain. The contrasting Hopfieldian view explains cognition as the result of transformations between or movement within representational spaces that are implemented by neural populations. Thus, the Hopfieldian view relegates details regarding the identity of and connections between specific neurons to the status of secondary explainers. Only the Hopfieldian approach has the representational and computational resources needed to develop novel neurofunctional objects that can serve as primary explainers of cognition.
References
-
- Gallistel, C. R. & King, A. P. Memory and the Computational Brain: Why Cognitive Science Will Transform Neuroscience Vol. 3 (Wiley, 2009).
-
- Goodman, N. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols (Hackett Publishing, 1976).
-
- Fodor, J. A. Propositional attitudes. Monist 61, 501–523 (1978). - DOI
-
- Fodor, J. A. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind (MIT Press, 1987).
-
- Fodor, J. A. A Theory of Content and Other Essays (MIT Press, 1990).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
