Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 30:8:630465.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.630465. eCollection 2021.

Dogs Supporting Human Health and Well-Being: A Biopsychosocial Approach

Affiliations
Review

Dogs Supporting Human Health and Well-Being: A Biopsychosocial Approach

Nancy R Gee et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Humans have long realized that dogs can be helpful, in a number of ways, to achieving important goals. This is evident from our earliest interactions involving the shared goal of avoiding predators and acquiring food, to our more recent inclusion of dogs in a variety of contexts including therapeutic and educational settings. This paper utilizes a longstanding theoretical framework- the biopsychosocial model- to contextualize the existing research on a broad spectrum of settings and populations in which dogs have been included as an adjunct or complementary therapy to improve some aspect of human health and well-being. A wide variety of evidence is considered within key topical areas including cognition, learning disorders, neurotypical and neurodiverse populations, mental and physical health, and disabilities. A dynamic version of the biopsychosocial model is used to organize and discuss the findings, to consider how possible mechanisms of action may impact overall human health and well-being, and to frame and guide future research questions and investigations.

Keywords: biopsychosocial; canine; dog; human health; human-animal interaction; mental health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A biopsychosocial perspective of how biological, psychological, and social influences may impact one another (solid lined arrows) and influence human health and well-being (represented here by the large thick circular shape).
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example of the potential for differential impact (represented by the different arrow thickness) of one mechanism of action (stress reduction) on the three realms of influence of overall health and well-being (depicted by the larger encompassing circle).

References

    1. Thalmann O, Shapiro B, Cui P, Schuenemann VJ, Sawyer SK, Greenfield D, et al. . Complete mitochondrial genomes of ancient canids suggest a European origin of domestic dogs. Science. (2013) 342:871–4. 10.1126/science.1243650 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albuquerque N, Guo K, Wilkinson A, Savalli C, Otta E, Mills D. Dogs recognize dog and human emotions. Biol Lett. (2016) 12:20150883. 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0883 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M. The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science. (2002) 298:1634–6. 10.1126/science.1072702 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V. A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol. (2003) 13:763–6. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00263-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Payne E, Bennett PC, Mcgreevy PD. Current perspectives on attachment and bonding in the dog–human dyad. Psychol Res Behav Manag. (2015) 8:71. 10.2147/PRBM.S74972 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources