Robotic esophagectomy: results from a tertiary care Italian center
- PMID: 33861402
- DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01050-2
Robotic esophagectomy: results from a tertiary care Italian center
Abstract
There is growing evidence supporting the use of minimally invasive resection in esophageal surgery, mainly due to reduced postoperative morbidity and faster recovery after surgery. In recent years, robot-assisted surgery has shown some potential benefits over conventional laparo-thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The purpose of this study is to report our experience with different esophageal resections with a full-robotic approach for malignant disease. All consecutive patients with resectable esophageal malignancy undergoing robotic esophagectomy over a 6-year time frame by a single surgical team were included in this analysis. Perioperative and clinicopathological outcomes were assessed. A total of 76 patients received robotic esophagectomy. Surgeries included 45 Lewis procedures, 25 McKeown procedures, and six transhiatal resections. There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions occurred. The rate of postoperative morbidity was 41%, while the rate of anastomotic leak was 13%. Overall, eight patients required reintervention. All patients received R0 resection, with a median of harvested lymph nodes of 35. 30-day and 90-day mortality was 3.9 and 7.9%, respectively. Our findings support the safety and oncological efficiency of full-robotic esophagectomy. All procedures of esophageal resection were associated with the expected perioperative morbidity while providing excellent pathological outcomes for patients with malignancy.
Keywords: Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Robot-assisted esophagectomy.
References
-
- Cuesta MA, van der Wielen N, Straatman J, van der Peet DL (2016) Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: keynote lecture. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 64:380–385 - DOI
-
- Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling G, Davies A, D’Journo XB, Gisbertz SS, Griffin SM, Hardwick R, Hoelscher A, Hofstetter W, Jobe B, Kitagawa Y, Law S, Mariette C, Maynard N, Morse CR, Nafteux P, Pera M, Pramesh CS, Puig S, Reynolds JV, Schroeder W, Smithers M, Wijnhoven BPL (2019) Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg 269:291–298 - DOI
-
- Pointer DT Jr, Saeed S, Naffouje SA, Mehta R, Hoffe SE, Dineen SP, Fleming JB, Fontaine JP, Pimiento JM (2020) Outcomes of 350 robotic-assisted esophagectomies at a high-volume cancer center: a contemporary propensity-score matched analysis. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004317 (Epub ahead of print) - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ali AM, Bachman KC, Worrell SG, Gray KE, Perry Y, Linden PA, Towe CW (2020) Robotic minimally invasive esophagectomy provides superior surgical resection. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08120-3 (Epub ahead of print) - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Kingma BF, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, van Der MJ, Kouwenhoven EA, Chao YK, Tsai CY, Fuchs HF, Bruns CJ, Sarkaria IS, Luketich JD, Haveman JW, van Etten B, Chiu PW, Chan SM, Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Hölzen JP, Sallum RA, Cecconello I, Egberts JH, Benedix F, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Perez D, Jansen K, Hubka M, Low DE, Biebl M, Pratschke J, Turner P, Pursnani K, Chaudry A, Smith M, Mazza E, Strignano P, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, UGIRA Study Group (2020) Worldwide techniques and outcomes in Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from the multicenter international registry. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004550 (Epub ahead of print) - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical