Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 16;11(1):8400.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87867-8.

Resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval

Affiliations

Resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval

Lluis Capdevila et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) is based on breathing at an optimal rate (or resonance frequency, RF) corresponding to the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). Our aim is to check whether the RF is a stable factor and analyse the HRV parameters individually per each breathing rate, comparing it with free slow breathing. A sample of 21 participants were trained in a test-retest HRVB protocol. The results indicated that RF changed between Test and Retest sessions in 66.7% of participants. This instability could be related to the average of interbeat interval (IBI). HRV time domain parameters (SDNN and RMSSD) were significantly higher for RF than for other breathing rates, including 6 breath/min and free slow breathing. Free slow breathing showed a lower heart rate averages than RF and other slow breathing rates. Overall, our study suggests the relevance of assessing RF individually and before each HRVB session, because the maximum cardiovascular benefits in terms of increasing HRV were found only at RF. Thus, breathing at the individualized and momentary frequency of resonance increases cardiac variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schema of the study procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparative box plots of RF individual values (breaths per minute) at Test and Retest.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representation of the spectrogram analysis (STFT, 120 s window, 1.5 s resolution, Hann window) of the IBI series (bottom trace) for each breathing rate (7, 6.5, 6, 5.5, 5 b/m) during the HRVB of Participant 15 during the Test session. Hotter color means more respiration energy of the signal and colder less, represented in arbitrary units. During this session, P15 breathed following the metronome with a clear pattern, hotter in 7 b/m (RF). (RR interval: IBI).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The mean interval time (ms) between heart beats (IBImean or RRmean) is represented for Test (A), ReTest (B) and RF-RFE comparison (C). “RF” represents the optimal resonance frequency, “Other Rates” represents the mean of the other breathing rates, “Lowest RSA” represents the lowest RSA amplitude, “6 b/m” represents the rate of 6 breathes per minute, “Free” represents the free slow breathing session only in retest, and “RFE” represents the expanded RF that consists on taking the IBImean of the nearest below and above rates from the RF. (Non-parametric Wilcoxon test has been performed when Friedman test showed significant differences.). * (p < 0.05) and ** (p < 0.01) mean differences with respect to RF in the same session. ## (p < 0.01) means differences with respect to Free Respiration in the same session.
Figure 5
Figure 5
HRV time domain parameters: SDNN (AC) and RMSDD (DF) for Test (A,D), ReTest (B,E) and RF-RFE comparison (C,F). “RF” represents the optimal resonance frequency, “Other Rates” represents the mean of the other breathing rates, “Lowest RSA” represents the lowest RSA amplitude, “6 b/m” represents the rate of 6 breathes per minute, “Free” represents the free slow breathing session only in retest, and “RFE” represents the expanded RF that consists on taking the SDNN/RMSSD of the nearest below and above rates from the RF. Non-parametric Wilcoxon test has been performed. * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01) and *** (p < 0.001) mean differences with respect to RF in the same session.

Comment in

References

    1. Lehrer PM, Vaschillo E, Vaschillo B. Resonant frequency biofeedback training to increase cardiac variability: Rationale and manual for training. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback. 2000;25:177–191. doi: 10.1023/A:1009554825745. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehrer PM. How does heart rate variability biofeedback work? Resonance, the baroreflex, and other mechanisms. Biofeedback. 2013;41:26–31. doi: 10.5298/1081-5937-41.1.02. - DOI
    1. Lehrer P, Vaschillo E. The future of heart rate variability biofeedback. Biofeedback. 2008;36:11–14.
    1. Economides M, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of the addition of heart rate variability biofeedback to a remote digital health intervention for depression. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback. 2020;45:75–86. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09458-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goessl VC, Curtiss JE, Hofmann SG. The effect of heart rate variability biofeedback training on stress and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 2017;47:2578–2586. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717001003. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources