Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Apr 16;11(1):8401.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87846-z.

Effectiveness of antimicrobial prophylaxis at 30 versus 60 min before cesarean delivery

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effectiveness of antimicrobial prophylaxis at 30 versus 60 min before cesarean delivery

Hadas Rubin et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) given within 30 compared to 30-60 min before skin incision on the incidence of infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery (CD). A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution on data between 2014 and 2018. Women who delivered by CD were divided into two groups according to AP timing before skin incision: group 1 within 30 min, and group 2 from 30 to 60 min. The primary outcome was the incidence of any infectious morbidity. Overall, 2989 women were eligible: 2791 in group 1 and 198 in group 2. The primary composite outcome occurred in 125 women (4.48%) in group 1 and 8 women (4.04%) in group 2 (OR, 1.11; 95% CI 0.54-2.31; P = 0.77). The rate of surgical site infection only, was 1.08% in group 1 and 0.51% in group 2 (OR, 2.13; 95% CI 0.29-15.70; P = 0.72). The incidence was comparable between the groups in a separate sub-analysis restricted to laboring CDs and obese women. The rate of infectious morbidity was similar among women who received AP within 30 min and from 30 to 60 min before skin incision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014;10:CD007482. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Birth: final data for 2014. Natl. Vital. Stat. Rep. 2015;64:1–64. - PubMed
    1. Zuarez-Easton S, Shalev E, Salim R. Trend in major neonatal and maternal morbidities accompanying the rise in the cesarean delivery rate. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12565. doi: 10.1038/srep12565. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mugford M, Kingston J, Chalmers I. Reducing the incidence of infection after caesarean section: implications of prophylaxis with antibiotics for hospital resources. BMJ. 1989;299:1003–1006. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6706.1003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perencevich EN, et al. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003;9:196–203. doi: 10.3201/eid0902.020232. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances