Virtual reality simulation in robot-assisted surgery: meta-analysis of skill transfer and predictability of skill
- PMID: 33864069
- PMCID: PMC8052560
- DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa066
Virtual reality simulation in robot-assisted surgery: meta-analysis of skill transfer and predictability of skill
Abstract
Background: The value of virtual reality (VR) simulators for robot-assisted surgery (RAS) for skill assessment and training of surgeons has not been established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify evidence on transferability of surgical skills acquired on robotic VR simulators to the operating room and the predictive value of robotic VR simulator performance for intraoperative performance.
Methods: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched systematically. Risk of bias was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Education. Correlation coefficients were chosen as effect measure and pooled using the inverse-variance weighting approach. A random-effects model was applied to estimate the summary effect.
Results: A total of 14 131 potential articles were identified; there were eight studies eligible for qualitative and three for quantitative analysis. Three of four studies demonstrated transfer of surgical skills from robotic VR simulators to the operating room measured by time and technical surgical performance. Two of three studies found significant positive correlations between robotic VR simulator performance and intraoperative technical surgical performance; quantitative analysis revealed a positive combined correlation (r = 0.67, 95 per cent c.i. 0.22 to 0.88).
Conclusion: Technical surgical skills acquired through robotic VR simulator training can be transferred to the operating room, and operating room performance seems to be predictable by robotic VR simulator performance. VR training can therefore be justified before operating on patients.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Virtual Reality Warm-up Before Robot-assisted Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.01.037. Epub 2021 Mar 31. J Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 33799119 Clinical Trial.
-
Association of Suturing Technical Skill Assessment Scores Between Virtual Reality Simulation and Live Surgery.J Endourol. 2022 Oct;36(10):1388-1394. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0158. Epub 2022 Sep 13. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 35848509 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1184-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 27. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28757439 Clinical Trial.
-
Virtual and Augmented Reality Simulators Show Intraoperative, Surgical Training, and Athletic Training Applications: A Scoping Review.Arthroscopy. 2025 Feb;41(2):505-515. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.02.011. Epub 2024 Feb 21. Arthroscopy. 2025. PMID: 38387769
-
Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2169-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4517-y. Epub 2015 Aug 25. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26304107 Review.
Cited by
-
Acceptance and use of extended reality in surgical training: an umbrella review.Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 4;13(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02723-w. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39633499 Free PMC article.
-
Longer operative times but equally safe - a propensity score-matched analysis for laparoscopic procedures in women with early-stage (r-ASRM I-II) endometriosis performed by gynecology residents compared to attending surgeons.BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06952-y. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 40148842 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05720-8. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38970090 Free PMC article.
-
Acquisition of robotic surgical skills does not require laparoscopic training: a randomized controlled trial.Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7325-7333. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09118-9. Epub 2022 Jun 8. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35676543 Clinical Trial.
-
Competency assessment for the Versius surgical robot: a validity investigation study of a virtual reality simulator-based test.Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7464-7471. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10221-8. Epub 2023 Jul 3. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37400688
References
-
- Sood A, Jeong W, Peabody JO, Hemal AK, Menon M. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: inching toward gold standard. Urol Clin North Am 2014;41:473–484 - PubMed
-
- Diana M, Marescaux J. Robotic surgery. Br J Surg 2015;102:e15–e28 - PubMed
-
- Intuitive Surgical. Annual Report 2018. http://www.annualreports.com/Company/intuitive-surgical-inc (accessed 20 February 2020)
-
- Zhou NX, Chen JZ, Liu Q, Zhang X, Wang Z, Ren S et al. Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2011;7:131–137 - PubMed
-
- Kowalewski KF, Schmidt MW, Proctor T, Pohl M, Wennberg E, Karadza E et al. Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study. Surg Endosc 2018;32:1656–1667 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources