Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 17;23(6):68.
doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01057-3.

Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Percutaneous Management Using Ablation, Brachytherapy, Intra-arterial Chemotherapy, and Intra-tumoral Immunotherapy

Affiliations
Review

Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Percutaneous Management Using Ablation, Brachytherapy, Intra-arterial Chemotherapy, and Intra-tumoral Immunotherapy

Florentine E F Timmer et al. Curr Oncol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive neoplasms, bearing a terrible prognosis. Stage III tumors, also known as locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), are unresectable, and current palliative chemotherapy regimens have only modestly improved survival in these patients. At this stage of disease, interventional techniques may be of value and further prolong life. The aim of this review was to explore current literature on locoregional percutaneous management for LAPC.

Recent findings: Locoregional percutaneous interventional techniques such as ablation, brachytherapy, and intra-arterial chemotherapy possess cytoreductive abilities and have the potential to increase survival. In addition, recent research demonstrates the immunomodulatory capacities of these treatments. This immune response may be leveraged by combining the interventional techniques with intra-tumoral immunotherapy, possibly creating a durable anti-tumor effect. This multimodality treatment approach is currently being examined in several ongoing clinical trials. The use of certain interventional techniques appears to improve survival in LAPC patients and may work synergistically when combined with immunotherapy. However, definitive conclusions can only be made when large prospective (randomized controlled) trials confirm these results.

Keywords: Ablation; Brachytherapy; Cryoablation; Intra-arterial chemotherapy; Intra-tumoral immunotherapy; Irreversible electroporation; Locally advanced pancreatic cancer; Microwave ablation; Radiofrequency ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Florentine E.F. Timmer, Bart Geboers, Sanne Nieuwenhuizen, Evelien A.C. Schouten, Madelon Dijkstra, Jan J.J. de Vries, M. Petrousjka van den Tol, Tanja D. de Gruijl, and Hester J. Scheffer declare no conflict of interest. Martijn R. Meijerink is a paid consultant for AngioDynamics, and received NanoKnife needle electrode compensation for clinical trials from AngioDynamics.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Changing immune status upon treatment with local interventional treatment in combination with local immunotherapy. Pre-treatment: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) maintains a heavily immunosuppressive environment, established by (among others) regulatory T-cells (Tregs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and suppressive cytokines. Treatment: combination treatment with intra-tumoral immune modulation and ablation, brachytherapy, or intra-arterial chemotherapy potentially creates synergism resulting in a durable anti-tumor effect. Immune potentiation combined with local ablation leads to the release of tumor antigens and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Subsequently activated dendritic cells (DCs) are now able to capture antigens and migrate towards the draining lymph nodes. Here, antigens are presented to lymphocytes, inducing antigen-specific expansion of effector T-cells, including T-helper-1 cells (Th1) and CD8+ (cytotoxic) T-cells, which will provide systemic anti-tumor immunity. Immune activation will lead to reduced TAMs, Tregs and MDSCs. Post-treatment: The tumor microenvironment demonstrates a more immunopermissive state, comprising of natural killer cells, M1 macrophages, anti-tumor T-cells (Th1 and CD8+), and permissive cytokines such as interferon (IFN). T-cells are also primed to roam the body in search of tumor cells, both at the primary tumor site as well as other locations, possibly resulting in the regression of untreated concomitant (micro)metastases. Figure created with BioRender.com
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Sixty-two-year-old male with LAPC on the basis of involvement of the superior mesenteric artery (0–90°, although complete encasement (360°) of the first jejunal branch), involvement of the aorta (0–90°), and involvement of the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (0–90°). A biliary stent (black asterisks in a, b, c, e, f) was placed prior to IRE using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). a Perprocedural contrast enhanced (ce)-CT of the LAPC in the head of the pancreas (white arrows) and biliary stent (black asterisk) prior to IRE treatment. The white asterisk shows significant dilation of the pancreatic duct. b Perprocedural axial view of 2 of the 4 needle electrodes in situ. c Perprocedural coronal view of all 4 needle electrodes in situ. The needles were successfully placed, bypassing all major blood vessels. d Sagittal view of 2 of the 4 needle electrodes in situ. e ce-CT immediately after IRE. The white arrows delineate the ablation zone, wherein formation of gas pockets is clearly visible (black arrow). The gas pockets maybe the result of water electrolysis and/or vaporization. f ce-CT 3 months post-IRE demonstrates a hypointense ablation zone (white arrows). The portal vein is open; dilation of the pancreatic duct (white asterisk) remains unchanged. No evidence of local recurrence or distant metastases

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kamisawa T, Wood LD, Itoi T, Takaori K. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2016;388(10039):73–85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00141-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, Hollebecque A, Burtin P, Goéré D, Seufferlein T, Haustermans K, van Laethem J, Conroy T, Arnold D, ESMO Guidelines Committee Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(Suppl 5):v56–v68. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv295. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2011;378(9791):607–620. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62307-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callery MP, Chang KJ, Fishman EK, Talamonti MS, William Traverso L, Linehan DC. Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):1727–1733. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0408-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. •• Ruarus AH, Vroomen L, Geboers B, van Veldhuisen E, Puijk RS, Nieuwenhuizen S, et al. Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced and Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer (PANFIRE-2): a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase II study. Radiology. 2019:191109 This is the largest prospective trial to date on percutaneous IRE for LAPC patients, thus holding valuable data on the potential of the technique. They demonstrated survival after diagnosis of 17 months and after treatment of 9.6 months. - PubMed

MeSH terms