Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 16;22(5):45.
doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00835-2.

Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL): State of the Art and Proper Management in Breast Cancer Patients on Endocrine Therapy

Affiliations
Review

Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL): State of the Art and Proper Management in Breast Cancer Patients on Endocrine Therapy

Anna Diana et al. Curr Treat Options Oncol. .

Abstract

About 70-80% of early breast cancer (BC) patients receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for at least 5 years. ET includes in the majority of cases the use of aromatase inhibitors, as upfront or switch strategy, that lead to impaired bone health. Given the high incidence and also the high prevalence of BC, cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) represents the most common long-term adverse event experimented by patients with hormone receptor positive tumours. CTIBL is responsible for osteoporosis occurrence and, as a consequence, fragility fractures that may negatively affect quality of life and survival expectancy. As recommended by main international guidelines, BC women on aromatase inhibitors should be carefully assessed for their fracture risk at baseline and periodically reassessed during adjuvant ET in order to early detect significant worsening in terms of bone health. Antiresorptive agents, together with adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, should be administered in BC patients during all course of ET, especially in those at high risk of osteoporotic fractures, as calculated by tools available for clinicians. Bisphosphonates, such as zoledronate or pamidronate, and anti-RANKL antibody, denosumab, are the two classes of antiresorptive drugs used in clinical practice with similar efficacy in preventing bone loss induced by aromatase inhibitor therapy. The choice between them, in the absence of direct comparison, should be based on patients' preference and compliance; the different safety profile is mainly related to the route of administration, although both types of drugs are manageable with due care, since most of the adverse events are predictable and preventable. Despite advances in management of CTIBL, several issues such as the optimal time of starting antiresorptive agents and the duration of treatment remain unanswered. Future clinical trials as well as increased awareness of bone health are needed to improve prevention, assessment and treatment of CTIBL in these long-term survivor patients.

Keywords: Bisphosphonates; Bone mineral density; Breast cancer; Denosumab; Endocrine therapy; Fracture risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Anna Diana has received compensation from Roche, Doxopharma and Springer Healthcare for service as a consultant, and has received reimbursement for travel and accommodations from Roche, Istituto Gentili, Italfarmaco, Ipsen and Novartis.

Francesca Carlino has received reimbursement for travel and accommodations from Italfarmaco.

Emilio Francesco Giunta declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Elisena Franzese declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Luigi Pio Guerrera declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Vincenzo Di Lauro declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Fortunato Ciardiello declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Bruno Daniele has received compensation from Ipsen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, MSD, Bayer, Roche and Amgen for service as a consultant, and he has received non-financial support from Ipsen, Sanofi and Bayer.

Michele Orditura has received research funding from Genentech, Pfizer, Eisai and Novartis; has received compensation from Italfarmaco, Epionpharma, Eli Lilly, Tesaro, Genentech and MSD for service as a consultant/advisor; and has received reimbursement for travel and accommodations from Roche and Eisai.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
    1. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, Newman LA, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(6):438–451. doi: 10.3322/caac.21583. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agrawal S. Late effects of cancer treatment in breast cancer survivors. South Asian J Cancer. 2014;3(2):112–115. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.130445. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hadji P. Cancer treatment-induced bone loss in women with breast cancer. Bonekey Rep. 2015;4:692. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2015.60. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edwards BJ, Raisch DW, Shankaran V, et al. Cancer therapy associated bone loss: implications for hip fractures in mid-life women with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(3):560–568. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1595. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siddiqui JA, Partridge NC. Physiological bone remodeling: systemic regulation and growth factor involvement. Physiology (Bethesda) 2016;31(3):233–245. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00061.2014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms