A scoping review of workplace wellness audit tools assessing physical activity and sedentary behaviour
- PMID: 33864307
- DOI: 10.1002/hpja.493
A scoping review of workplace wellness audit tools assessing physical activity and sedentary behaviour
Abstract
Background: Regular physical inactivity and excessive sedentary behaviour are public and population health concerns. The workplace is an ideal health promotion intervention setting to support employees, particularly office workers. Workplace assessments are a critical component of workplace health promotion programming. The aim of this project was to conduct a scoping review to systematically identify and describe workplace audit tools that assess physical activity and sedentary behaviour influences, as two independent behaviours, through a social ecological lens.
Methods: Fourteen electronic databases were searched for academic literature and 69 web-based resources were searched for grey literature in May 2017. English language workplace audit tools with items on physical activity or sedentary behaviour established in western countries were included. Key characteristics (ie, aim, type, health behaviour, validity, reliability and theory/model/framework) of the audit tools, checklists or questionnaires for office-based workplaces were identified, described and summarised.
Results: The scoping review identified 21 relevant tools. Most tools focused on physical activity alone and did not address sedentary behaviour as a distinct behaviour. Few tools included items assessing physical activity and sedentary behaviour influences across multiple levels of the social ecological model. The most common social ecological focuses in the tools were policy and environmental influences.
Conclusions: Numerous workplace physical activity and/or sedentary behaviour audit tools were available. However, a gap was identified as tools and resources that assess and support organisational changes to influence physical activity and sedentary behaviour as two independent health behaviours across multiple social ecological levels within the workplace had not been developed.
Keywords: activities of daily living; audit; checklist; health promotion; office; social ecological model; tool.
© 2021 Australian Health Promotion Association.
Similar articles
-
Assessing and understanding sedentary behaviour in office-based working adults: a mixed-method approach.BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 27;16:360. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3023-z. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27117178 Free PMC article.
-
Participatory Approaches in the Context of Research Into Workplace Health Promotion to Improve Physical Activity Levels and Reduce Sedentary Behavior Among Office-Based Workers: Scoping Review.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jun 19;10:e50195. doi: 10.2196/50195. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024. PMID: 38896458 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of multi-component interventions targeting physical activity or sedentary behaviour amongst office workers: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):1329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09433-7. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32873260 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Using nudges to promote physical activity and to reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: a scoping review protocol.BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 19;10(11):e038205. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038205. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33444182 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of workplace interventions on sedentary behaviour and physical activity: an umbrella review with meta-analyses and narrative synthesis.Lancet Public Health. 2025 Apr;10(4):e295-e308. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00038-6. Lancet Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40175011
Cited by
-
"Back Health 24/7/365"-A Novel, Comprehensive "One Size Fits All" Workplace Health Promotion Intervention for Occupational Back Health among Hospital Employees.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;21(6):772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060772. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38929018 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(3):105-13.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404815/pdf/nihms229379.pdf [Verified 29 Jul 2020]
-
- Panahi S, Tremblay A. Sedentariness and health: Is sedentary behavior more than just physical inactivity? Front Public Heal. 2018;6:1-7.
-
- Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219-29.Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9 [Verified Jul 29 2020]
-
- Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, Bajaj RR, Silver MA, Mitchell MS, et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):123-32.
-
- Katzmarzyk PT, Powell KE, Jakicic JM, Troiano RP, Piercy K, Tennant B. Sedentary behavior and health: Update from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1227-41.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous