Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Oct 15;58(10):973-977.
Epub 2021 Apr 17.

Gastric Lavage for Prevention of Feeding Intolerance in Neonates Delivered Through Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
  • PMID: 33864449
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Gastric Lavage for Prevention of Feeding Intolerance in Neonates Delivered Through Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Poonam Singh et al. Indian Pediatr. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: The role of gastric lavage in neonates delivered through meconium-stained amniotic fluid remains unclear.

Objective: This study evaluated the effects of gastric lavage, compared to no gastric lavage, on the incidences of feeding intolerance, respiratory distress, meconium aspiration synd-rome, time to establish breastfeeding, hospitalization and pro-cedure-related complications in late-preterm and term neonates delivered through meconium-stained amniotic fluid.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources and selection criteria: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and other databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials using search terms: neonate OR newborn infant, meconium OR meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and lavage OR gastric lavage from inception to May 2020. Data were pooled in RevMan and analyzed in GRADE.

Results: Pooled effects (9 randomized controlled trials, number=3668), showed a significant reduction in the incidence of feeding intolerance (relative risk 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.58,0.85, I2=0) after gastric lavage. No difference was observed for the incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome (4 studies) or procedure-related complications (7 studies). Only one study, reporting the proportion of neonates with low oxygenation (SpO2<85%), did not find any significant difference. No study evaluated the effects of gastric lavage on respiratory distress, breastfeeding, and hospitalization.

Conclusions: Low-quality evidence supported the role of gastric lavage for the prevention of feeding intolerance in late-preterm and term neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Applicability of results was limited by the high risk of bias. Well-conducted randomized controlled trials with important patient outcomes are needed before recommending the practice of gastric lavage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources