Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;31(2):608-618.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06549-0. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

The effect of body mass index on the outcomes of cementless medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacements

Hasan Raza Mohammad  1   2 , Stephen Mellon  3 , Andrew Judge  3   4 , Christopher Dodd  5 , David Murray  3   5
Affiliations

The effect of body mass index on the outcomes of cementless medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacements

Hasan Raza Mohammad et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Given an increasingly overweight population, unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) are being performed in patients with higher body mass indices (BMIs). There are concerns that cemented fixation will not last. Cementless fixation may offer a solution, but the long term results in different BMI groups has not been assessed. We studied the effect of BMI on the outcomes of cementless UKRs.

Methods: A prospective cohort of 1000 medial cementless mobile-bearing UKR with a mean follow up of 6.6 years (SD 2.7) were analysed. UKRs were categorised into four BMI groups: (1) ≥ 18.5 to < 25 kg/m2 (normal), (2) 25 to < 30 kg/m2 (overweight), (3) 30 to < 35 kg/m2 (obese class 1) and (4) ≥ 35 kg/m2 (obese class 2). Implant survival was assessed using endpoints reoperation and revision. Functional outcomes were assessed.

Results: Ten-year cumulative revision rate for the normal (n = 186), overweight (n = 434), obese class 1 (n = 213) and obese class 2 (n = 127) groups were 1.8% (CI 0.4-7.4), 2.6% (CI 1.3-5.1), 3.8% (CI 1.5-9.2) and 1.7% (CI 0.4-6.8) with no significant differences between groups (p = 0.79). The 10-year cumulative reoperation rates were 2.7% (CI 0.8-8.2), 3.8% (CI 2.2-6.6), 5.2% (CI 2.5-10.7) and 1.7% (CI 0.4-6.8) with no significant differences between groups (p = 0.44). The 10-year median Oxford Knee Score were 43.0, 46.0, 44.0 and 38.0 respectively.

Conclusion: Cementless mobile-bearing UKR has low 10-year reoperation and revision rates across in all BMI groups, and there are no significant differences between the groups. Although higher BMI groups had slightly worse functional outcomes, the improvement in function compared to preoperatively tended to be better. This study suggests that BMI should not be considered a contraindication for the cementless mobile-bearing UKR.

Keywords: Body mass index; Cementless fixation; Mid-long term outcomes; Unicondylar knee replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author or one or more of the authors have received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. In addition, benefits have been or will be directed to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other non-profit organisation with which one or more of the authors are associated.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier graph of cementless Oxford UKR implant survival (reoperation endpoint) across different BMI groups
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier graph of cementless Oxford UKR implant survival (revision endpoint) across different BMI groups
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bar chart of the median OKS at different time points in the different BMI groups. Error bars represent the interquartile range
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdel MP, Bonadurer GF, III, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD. Increased aseptic tibial failures in patients with a BMI ≥ 35 and well-aligned total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:2181–2184. - PubMed
    1. Amin A, Clayton R, Patton J, Gaston M, Cook R, Brenkel I. Total knee replacement in morbidly obese patients: results of a prospective, matched study. Bone Joint J. 2006;88:1321–1326. - PubMed
    1. Anandacoomarasamy A, Caterson I, Sambrook P, Fransen M, March L. The impact of obesity on the musculoskeletal system. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32:211–222. - PubMed
    1. Australian Orthopaedic Association . Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip knee & shoulder arthroplasty. Australian Orthopaedic Association; 2018.
    1. Bonutti PM, Goddard MS, Zywiel MG, Khanuja HS, Johnson AJ, Mont MA. Outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty stratified by body mass index. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1149–1153. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources