Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul;30(5):767-782.
doi: 10.1007/s10646-021-02411-8. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

Wildlife poisoning: a novel scoring system and review of analytical methods for anticoagulant rodenticide determination

Affiliations
Review

Wildlife poisoning: a novel scoring system and review of analytical methods for anticoagulant rodenticide determination

Irene Valverde et al. Ecotoxicology. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are commonly used to control rodent populations and frequently involved in wildlife and domestic animal poisoning. These poisoning cases (especially for ARs) are a challenge for forensic toxicologists, and adequate post-mortem examination and toxicological analyses become essential for a proper diagnosis. Publications describing different analytical methods for AR analysis in biological samples are growing, and a clear compilation of the overall picture is needed to standardize methodologies in future research. This review aims to compile and compare the analytical procedures applied for AR determination in the literature. Using this information, a scoring system was developed for those techniques using liver and blood as matrices, and the techniques were ranked considering different criteria (i.e. sample amount required, recoveries, limits of quantification (LOQs), number of ARs analysed, points of the calibration curve and multi-class methods). This review shows an overview of the main methods used for AR analysis in forensic toxicology and will help to elucidate future directions to improve multi-residue techniques to detect the ARs involved in wildlife lethal poisoning.

Keywords: Analytical methods; Anticoagulant rodenticides; Forensic; Poisoning; Scoring system; Wildlife.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adamowicz P, Kala M (2009) LC-MS and LC-MS/MS determination of six anticoagulant rodenticides in blood. Problems of Forensic Sciences LXXVII:53–63
    1. Albert CA, Wilson LK, Mineau P, Trudeau S, Elliott JE (2010) Anticoagulant rodenticides in three owl species from western. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 58:451–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-009-9402-z - DOI
    1. Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Štajnbaher D, Schenck FJ (2003) Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J of AOAC Int 86:412–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/86.2.412 - DOI
    1. Armentano A, Iammarino M, Magro SL, Muscarella M (2012) Validation and application of multi-residue analysis of eight anticoagulant rodenticides by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection. J of Vet Diagn Invest 24:307–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638711433354 - DOI
    1. Berny P (2007) Pesticides and the intoxication of wild animals. J of Vet Pharmacol and Ther 30:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2007.00836.x - DOI

LinkOut - more resources