Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 17;21(1):73.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01267-0.

A demonstration of using formal consensus methods within guideline development; a case study

P Carter  1   2 , K J M O'Donoghue  3 , K Dworzynski  3 , L O'Shea  3 , V Roberts  4 , T Reeves  3 , A Bastounis  4   5 , M A Mugglestone  4   3 , J Fawke  6 , S Pilling  4   3   7
Affiliations

A demonstration of using formal consensus methods within guideline development; a case study

P Carter et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Recommendations within guidelines are developed by synthesising the best available evidence; when limited evidence is identified recommendations are generally based on informal consensus. However, there are potential biases in group decision making, and formal consensus methods may help reduce these.

Methods: We conducted a case study using formal consensus, to develop one set of recommendations within the Neonatal Parenteral Nutrition guideline being produced for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Statements were generated through identification of published guidelines on several topics relating to neonatal parenteral nutrition. Ten high quality guidelines were included, and 28 statements were generated; these statements were rated by the committee via two rounds of voting. The statements which resulted in agreement were then used to develop the recommendations.

Results: The approach was systematic and provided transparency. Additionally, a number of lessons were learnt; including the value of selecting the appropriate topic, giving adequate time to the process, and ensuring methodologies are understood by the committee for their value and relevance.

Conclusion: Formal consensus is a valuable option for use within guideline development when specific criteria are met. The approach provides transparent methodology, ensuring clarity on how recommendations are developed.

Keywords: Formal consensus; Guideline development; Methodology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AS, JF, KD, KJMO’D, LO’S, MM, PC, TR have nothing to declare.

SP receives funding from NICE for the development of guidelines and is supported by the NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart of guideline selection for evidence review “General Principles” Neonatal parenteral nutrition NICE Guideline [NG154] 2020
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Institute for Health Care and Excellence. Developing NICE guidelines: the manual. 2014 [cited 2019 3rd January]; Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/our-programmes/de.... - PubMed
    1. Goncalo JA, Duguid MM. Hidden consequences of the group-serving bias: causal attributions and the quality of group decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2008;107(2):219–233. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.011. - DOI
    1. Lipman T. Power and influence in clinical effectiveness and evidence-based medicine. Fam Pract. 2000;17(6):557–563. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.6.557. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vinokur A, Burnstein E, Sechrest L, Wortman PM. Group decision making by experts: field study of panels evaluating medical technologies. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;49(1):70–84. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.70. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larson JR, Jr, et al. Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75(1):93–108. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.93. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources