Out-of-pocket expenditure for administration of benzathine penicillin G injections for secondary prophylaxis in patients with rheumatic heart disease: A registry-based data from a tertiary care center in Northern India
- PMID: 33865513
- PMCID: PMC8065366
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.11.151
Out-of-pocket expenditure for administration of benzathine penicillin G injections for secondary prophylaxis in patients with rheumatic heart disease: A registry-based data from a tertiary care center in Northern India
Abstract
Background: Costs can be a major barrier to medication adherence in low and middle-income countries and are an important target for policy-level interventions. The use of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) for secondary prevention of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) averts substantial morbidity and mortality, yet the total out-of-pocket costs for patients receiving this intervention are unknown.
Objective: To estimate the total out-of-pocket costs for obtaining BPG prophylaxis among RHD patients in India.
Methods: We prospectively collected self-reported drug-, transportation-, and provider-related costs for secondary prophylaxis among RHD patients presenting for follow-up to a tertiary care centre in New Delhi, India. Monthly costs were estimated by adjusting unit costs by frequency of drug administration.
Results: The cost data provided by 420 patients [mean age (±SD) 11.6 (±2.9) years] was analysed. Majority of the patients were male (65.2%), hailed from rural areas (87.1%), and belonged to lower socioeconomic strata (73.3%). The median monthly total out-of-pocket costs (IQR) for obtaining BPG injections was Indian rupee (INR) 62.5 (42.5-117.0). The median costs for procuring the drug (IQR) was INR 34.0(30.0-39.0). Whereas median costs (IQR) for health care provider and transportation was INR 16.0 [0-32.0]) and INR 11 [0-31.0] respectively. When expressed as mean (SD), the costs for transportation constituted 50% of the total costs, whereas the mean cost for drug procurement and drug administration constituted 30% and 22% of the total costs respectively.
Conclusion: RHD patients receiving BPG prophylaxis incur substantial out-of-pocket costs, with transportation costs constituting nearly half of the total expenditures. National investments in RHD control must be strategically directed at improving health care access and drug supply in order to lower the total costs of secondary prophylaxis and improve adherence rates.
Keywords: Rheumatic heart disease; aa; adherence; health economics; out of pocket expenditure; secondary prophylaxis.
Copyright © 2020 Cardiological Society of India. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest None.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Barriers and facilitators of benzathine penicillin G adherence among rheumatic heart disease patients: a mixed methods systematic review using the COM-B (capability, opportunity, and motivation for behavior) model.Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 3;13(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02691-1. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39627899 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability and Implementation Challenges of Benzathine Penicillin G Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study.Glob Heart. 2025 Jan 29;20(1):8. doi: 10.5334/gh.1393. eCollection 2025. Glob Heart. 2025. PMID: 39896316 Free PMC article.
-
Intramuscular versus enteral penicillin prophylaxis to prevent progression of rheumatic heart disease: Study protocol for a noninferiority randomized trial (the GOALIE trial).Am Heart J. 2024 Sep;275:74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.012. Epub 2024 May 24. Am Heart J. 2024. PMID: 38797460
-
Determining the impact of Benzathine penicillin G prophylaxis in children with latent rheumatic heart disease (GOAL trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Am Heart J. 2019 Sep;215:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 8. Am Heart J. 2019. PMID: 31301533
-
Severe adverse reactions to benzathine penicillin G in rheumatic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322873. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40333929 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Recent Advances in the Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease Continuum.Pathogens. 2022 Jan 28;11(2):179. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11020179. Pathogens. 2022. PMID: 35215123 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Global Impact of Rheumatic Heart Disease.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Oct 1;23(11):160. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01592-2. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021. PMID: 34599389 Review.
-
Barriers and facilitators of benzathine penicillin G adherence among rheumatic heart disease patients: a mixed methods systematic review using the COM-B (capability, opportunity, and motivation for behavior) model.Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 3;13(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02691-1. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39627899 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Carapetis J.R. Rheumatic heart disease in developing countries. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(5):439–441. - PubMed
-
- Carapetis J.R., McDonald M., Wilson N.J. Acute rheumatic fever. Lancet. 2005;366(9480):155–168. - PubMed
-
- Stollerman G.H., Rusoff J.H., Hirschfeld I. Prophylaxis against group A streptococci in rheumatic fever: the use of single monthly injections of benzathine penicillin G. N Engl J Med. 1955;252(19):787–792. - PubMed
-
- Remenyi B., Carapetis J., Wyber R. Position statement of the World Heart Federation on the prevention and control of rheumatic heart disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013;10(5):284–292. - PubMed