Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021:256:179-214.
doi: 10.1007/398_2020_58.

Water and Soil Pollution: Ecological Environmental Study Methodologies Useful for Public Health Projects. A Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Water and Soil Pollution: Ecological Environmental Study Methodologies Useful for Public Health Projects. A Literature Review

Roberto Lillini et al. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021.

Abstract

Health risks at population level may be investigated with different types of environmental studies depending on access to data and funds. Options include ecological studies, case-control studies with individual interviews and human sample analysis, risk assessment or cohort studies. Most public health projects use data and methodologies already available due to the cost of ad-hoc data collection. The aim of the article is to perform a literature review of environmental exposure and health outcomes with main focus on methodologies for assessing an association between water and/or soil pollutants and cancer. A systematic literature search was performed in May 2019 using PubMed. Articles were assessed by four independent reviewers. Forty articles were identified and divided into four groups, according to the data and methods they used, i.e.: (1) regression models with data by geographical area; (2) regression models with data at individual level; (3) exposure intensity threshold values for evaluating health outcome trends; (4) analyses of distance between source of pollutant and health outcome clusters. The issue of exposure assessment has been investigated for over 40 years and the most important innovations regard technologies developed to measure pollutants, statistical methodologies to assess exposure, and software development. Thanks to these changes, it has been possible to develop and apply geo-coding and statistical methods to reduce the ecological bias when considering the relationship between humans, geographic areas, pollutants, and health outcomes. The results of the present review may contribute to optimize the use of public health resources.

Keywords: Health outcomes; Public health; Soil pollution; Spatial analysis; Statistical methods; Water pollution.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aballay LR, Díaz Mdel P, Francisca FM, Muñoz SE (2012) Cancer incidence and pattern of arsenic concentration in drinking water wells in Córdoba, Argentina. Int J Environ Health Res 22(3):220–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2011.628792 - DOI
    1. Armijo R, Coulson AH (1975) Epidemiology of stomach cancer in Chile--the role of nitrogen fertilizers. Int J Epidemiol 4(4):301–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/4.4.301 - DOI
    1. Baker D, Kjellström T, Calderon R, Pastides H (1999) Environmental epidemiology: a textbook on study methods and public health applications. Preliminary edition. World Health Organization, Malta
    1. Banning A, Benfer M (2017) Drinking water uranium and potential health effects in the German Federal State of Bavaria. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(8):E927. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080927 - DOI
    1. Bulka CM, Jones RM, Turyk ME, Stayner LT, Argos M (2016) Arsenic in drinking water and prostate cancer in Illinois counties: an ecologic study. Environ Res 148:450–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.04.030 - DOI