Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;45(8):2432-2438.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06116-1. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

Delayed Postoperative Hemorrhage Complicating Major Supramesocolic Surgery Management and Outcomes

Affiliations

Delayed Postoperative Hemorrhage Complicating Major Supramesocolic Surgery Management and Outcomes

Emmanuel Devant et al. World J Surg. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The place of surgery and interventional radiology in the management of delayed (> 24 h) hemorrhage (DHR) complicating supramesocolic surgery is still to define. The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes of DHR using a combined multimodal strategy.

Methods: Between 2005 and 2019, 57 patients (median age 64 years) experienced 86 DHR episodes after pancreatic resection (n = 26), liver transplantation (n = 24) and other (n = 7). Hemodynamically stable patients underwent computed tomography evaluation followed by interventional radiology (IR) treatment (stenting and/or embolization) or surveillance. Hemodynamically unstable patients were offered upfront surgery. Failure to identify the leak was managed by either prophylactic stenting/embolization of the most likely bleeding source or surveillance.

Results: Mortality was 32% (n = 18). Bleeding recurrence occurred in 22 patients (39%) and was multiple in 7 (12%). Sentinel bleeding was recorded in 77 (81%) of episodes, and the bleeding source could not be identified in 26 (30%). Failure to control bleeding was recorded in 9 (28%) of 32 episodes managed by surgery and 4 (11%) of 41 episodes managed by IR (p = 0.14). Recurrence was similar after stenting and embolization (n = 4/18, 22% vs n = 8/26, 31%, p = 0.75) of the bleeding source. Recurrence was significantly lower after prophylactic IR management than surveillance of an unidentified bleeding source (n = 2/10, 20% vs. n = 11/16, 69%, p = 0.042).

Conclusion: IR management should be favored for the treatment of DHR in hemodynamically stable patients. Prophylactic IR management of an unidentified leak decreases recurrence risks.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280 - DOI
    1. Floortje van Oosten A, Smits FJ, van den Heuvel DAF et al (2019) Diagnosis and management of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB 21:953–961 - DOI
    1. de Castro SMM, Kuhlmann KFD, Busch ORC et al (2005) Delayed massive hemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery: embolization or surgery? Ann Surg 241:85–91 - DOI
    1. Boleslawski E, Bouras AF, Truant S et al (2013) Hepatic artery ligation for arterial rupture following liver transplantation: a reasonable option. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg 13:1055–1062 - DOI
    1. Yang J, Zhang X-H, Huang Y-H et al (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of abdominal arterial bleeding after radical gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of 1875 consecutive resections for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 20:510–520 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources