Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 1;30(7):585-595.
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001852.

Comparison of Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Implant Surgery With or Without Prior Failed Trabeculectomy

Affiliations

Comparison of Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Implant Surgery With or Without Prior Failed Trabeculectomy

Emily F Dawson et al. J Glaucoma. .

Abstract

Precis: A comparison of 186 glaucoma patients with mixed diagnoses who underwent nonvalved glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implant surgery showed similar long-term intraocular pressure (IOP), medication, and visual acuity (VA) outcomes between those with prior failed trabeculectomy surgery versus those without.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether prior failed trabeculectomy adversely affects the outcome of glaucoma tube surgery.

Patients and methods: A total of 186 eyes of 186 patients who underwent a nonvalved GDD implant surgery by a single surgeon between 1996 and 2015 at a University practice were included. Patients were of mixed diagnoses and over 18 years old. Before the GDD surgery, 65 had a previous failed glaucoma filtering surgery and 121 had no prior glaucoma surgery. Demographic information, preoperative and postoperative IOP, medication, VA, and complications were collected from chart review.

Results: No significant difference was noted in mean IOP and mean medication use (13.0 and 12.6 mm Hg on 2.0 and 1.7 medication classes at 5 y postoperatively, respectively), mean VA and change in VA from baseline, or numbers of complications (P>0.05), between eyes that had a prior failed filtration surgery and those that had not. Kaplan-Meier plots for failure over 5 years using a lower limit of <5 mm Hg and an upper limit of ≥18, ≥15, or ≥12 mm Hg did not show a significant difference between groups. Subanalyses were performed to examine only primary glaucoma eyes and results were similar. Further group subanalyses comparing those with baseline IOP ≥25 or <25 mm Hg, age 65 and above or below 65 years and those specifically with Baerveldt 350 mm2 implants also did not show significant differences.

Conclusion: Prior failed filtration surgery does not appear to affect the outcome of future GDD surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: M.B.S. reports personal fees from Allergan, personal fees from Ocular Therapeutix, study grant from Allergan to the University of Florida, personal fees from Medical College of Georgia, personal fees from Elsevier, other from International Society of Glaucoma Surgery, outside the submitted work. C.R.B. reports a study grant from Allergan to the University of Florida. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Purtskhvanidze K, Saeger M, Treumer F, et al. Long-term results of glaucoma drainage device surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19:14.
    1. Molteno AC, Bevin TH, Herbison P, et al. Long-term results of primary trabeculectomies and Molteno implants for primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:1444–1450.
    1. Mills RP, Reynolds A, Emond MJ, et al. Long-term survival of Molteno glaucoma drainage devices. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:299–305.
    1. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:789–803.
    1. Christakis PG, Zhang D, Budenz DL, et al. ABC-AVB Study Groups. Five-year pooled data analysis of the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study and the Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;176:118–126.

Publication types